Forum menu
29er Frames for 120...
 

[Closed] 29er Frames for 120mm forks? Current geometry?

Posts: 7373
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Ssimon.... How much for the genesis frame ?


 
Posted : 12/05/2016 10:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Aye no worries, my email is in my profile.


 
Posted : 12/05/2016 10:30 pm
Posts: 2142
Free Member
 

Pinnacle Ramin?


 
Posted : 12/05/2016 10:45 pm
 mboy
Posts: 12651
Free Member
 

Mboy are you saying that you shuffle back all the time on the whyte or do you fit in it ??

Fit in it nicely. It's got a nice low BB, long front centre, slack HA, very much feel in the bike not on it.

IMO On One missed a trick with that Parkwood, cos the price is right, the weight is bang on, but the geometry is somewhat behind the times... Seat angle is too slack, head angle not slack enough, reach figures are at least 25mm too short size for size, and the head tubes could be shorter. Oh and the BB whilst not lofty could be lower.


 
Posted : 12/05/2016 10:58 pm
Posts: 2142
Free Member
 

IMO On One missed a trick with that Parkwood, cos the price is right, the weight is bang on, but the geometry is somewhat behind the times...

The 650b parkwood geometry is worse, about 20m less real than the 29r


 
Posted : 13/05/2016 6:44 am
Posts: 2142
Free Member
 

*less reach* even.

I need more coffee


 
Posted : 13/05/2016 7:15 am
Posts: 7373
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Don't understand it to be honest. On one are normally pretty good geometry wise but this seems a bit strange.


 
Posted : 13/05/2016 8:02 am
Posts: 19
Free Member
 

Not the cheapest way to do it but I had Nicolai make me an Argon custom. 470mm reach with a shorter back end. Mine is an XC race bike but they will tailor their bikes however you want for a cost.


 
Posted : 13/05/2016 8:13 am
Posts: 7972
Free Member
 

renton - Don't understand it to be honest. On one are normally pretty good geometry wise but this seems a bit strange.

Things change, OO didn't that's why.


 
Posted : 13/05/2016 8:59 am
Posts: 35040
Full Member
 

I've nothing to add, apart from; thread by Renton, yey!


 
Posted : 13/05/2016 9:05 am
Posts: 7373
Free Member
Topic starter
 

:mrgreen:


 
Posted : 13/05/2016 9:27 am
Posts: 14707
Free Member
 

Don't understand it to be honest. On one are normally pretty good geometry wise but this seems a bit strange.

Hmmm, not convinced about that, latest On One email introducing the DeeDar as "long low and slack", err sorry but that's not long by any stretch of the imagination (or even reasonably long)


 
Posted : 16/05/2016 2:47 pm
Posts: 4315
Free Member
 

^ Surely the 'DeeDar' geo is wrong? Surely?!? 😯


 
Posted : 16/05/2016 6:21 pm
Posts: 66111
Full Member
 

Nukeproof Scout? It's built for 130mm (if there's such a thing as a EC56 headset, that'd deal with that) and you'd probably want to go up a size as it's short of reach... But it's good. Even with a shorter fork it'll still be slacker than a lot of the competition. It's also stiff as ****, I couldn't live with that personally but I liked it otherwise.


 
Posted : 16/05/2016 7:16 pm
Posts: 279
Full Member
 

Had a similar issue with my fireline - great bike but way shorter than advertised so reach is way down. So that is for sale! Ended up going for the Cotic Solaris mk2 in XL to get the reach I like. Building up now but looks great in gunmetal grey! I tried the Scout and it is fun but you would not want to ride it all day - it really is stiff.


 
Posted : 17/05/2016 12:32 am
Posts: 7766
Full Member
 

Crashrash, what size is your Fireline and how does it differ to O-O's shonky geo charts? And obviously, how much are you after?


 
Posted : 17/05/2016 12:52 pm
Page 2 / 2