Forum menu
2009 Singletrack Re...
 

[Closed] 2009 Singletrack Reader Awards - VOTE NOW!

Posts: 1772
Topic starter
 
[#1008956]

[img] [/img]

Your nominations have been sifted through and we’ve drawn up the finalists for each category.

The great thing about our awards is that they are entirely reader based, so it’s all about you and your experiences, so the results aren’t dictated by any bureaucratic back-handers.

NB: You can only vote once. You can click on images to go to manufacturers’ site. The “Best Feature” finalists are available to read online (again, click the icons to investigate).

[url= http://www.singletrackworld.com/reader-awards/ ]Click here to go to the online voting page.[/url]


 
Posted : 03/11/2009 3:02 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50593
 

Done!


 
Posted : 03/11/2009 3:11 pm
Posts: 1772
Topic starter
 

Ta! 🙂


 
Posted : 03/11/2009 3:21 pm
 sv
Posts: 2815
Free Member
 

+1.


 
Posted : 03/11/2009 3:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

+1


 
Posted : 03/11/2009 3:31 pm
Posts: 1772
Topic starter
 

Ta x 2 😉


 
Posted : 03/11/2009 3:52 pm
 nbt
Posts: 12478
Full Member
 

Was I too fast? I voted at about 10am!


 
Posted : 03/11/2009 4:08 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50593
 

Good for you.


 
Posted : 03/11/2009 4:30 pm
Posts: 1562
Free Member
 

I appear to mostly have 'no opinion'!

Sorry, but I can't really give a comparison between three different products unless I've tried all three - otherwise I'd just be giving an opinion from other people's opinions on here... 😯

I mean, 18 Bikes is a great shop, but no idea if they're any better or worse than any of the others.


 
Posted : 03/11/2009 10:46 pm
 Mark
Posts: 4423
 

So what's your point?

I don;t mean that in a facetious way.. Genuinely asked..

🙂


 
Posted : 04/11/2009 12:09 pm
 nuke
Posts: 5800
Full Member
 

Done.

Surprised to see Nirvana cycles in Best Bike Shop


 
Posted : 04/11/2009 12:15 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

I think we would be ok to just vote for the option you know. Otherwise there will be very few votes for some of the categories.


 
Posted : 04/11/2009 12:37 pm
 nbt
Posts: 12478
Full Member
 

Mark - Administrator

So what's your point?

I don;t mean that in a facetious way.. Genuinely asked..

I was thinking the same as Gavin. It's more of a popularity contest than a case of "this is better than that", but that's not a bad thing - if anything that's the point? If I genuinely like something, I'll vote for it - e.g. I think lee quarry is ace, so that got a vote, or if I hate something I'll not vote for it (Hi dan :lol:). MOst were "no opinion" though.

One thing, when I go back now, it says I've voted and can't vote again which is fine - can you display out what I voted for?


 
Posted : 04/11/2009 12:40 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

I appear to mostly have 'no opinion'!

Sorry, but I can't really give a comparison between three different products unless I've tried all three - otherwise I'd just be giving an opinion from other people's opinions on here...

I mean, 18 Bikes is a great shop, but no idea if they're any better or worse than any of the others.

I was pretty much the same

Why?
Hope Hoops and Garmin GPS are hardly 'new products' are they?
I wouldn't buy any of the bikes listed in either catergory
I didn't do any of those events
Shops - Is Nirvana Cycles the one in Westcott? I wouldn't give them the steam off my wee after the woman in there was rude to me the only time I ever went in, and I don't know the other shops.

etc....

EDIT
Actually I lied. I've been to Biketreks a couple of times and they are very helpful. I voted for them.


 
Posted : 04/11/2009 12:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]I appear to mostly have 'no opinion'! [/i]
Likewise, but I can't see a problem with that? It'd be a bit wierd if you HAD to vote for something you knew nothing about.


 
Posted : 04/11/2009 12:55 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50593
 

Is that not the whole point of them adding no opinion to the votes, if you have no experience if the products or places you can just opt for that.


 
Posted : 04/11/2009 1:03 pm
Posts: 1562
Free Member
 

Yeah, fair points back at me.
I was just a bit surprised (at myself mostly) that I had no direct knowledge of half the pieces of kit, or the events etc. I just wondered how many people were voting for things they'd never ridden.


 
Posted : 04/11/2009 1:09 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I was pretty much no opinion on most too.

So what happens if "no opinion" wins all the categories? 😉


 
Posted : 04/11/2009 1:59 pm
Posts: 316
Full Member
 

yeah, mostly no opinion here.

Even though I know and like biketreks, it still doesn't seem right to vote for them as better than two other shops I've never visited (although I did anyway).

It is just a popularity contest: great things people know little about aren't going to get as many votes as good things that are well known.

Mind you, it's the Singletrack awards, not the Nobel or Oscars. Does it really matter that much?


 
Posted : 04/11/2009 2:59 pm
Posts: 1562
Free Member
 

Mind you, it's the Singletrack awards, not the Nobel or Oscars. Does it really matter that much?

True! 🙂


 
Posted : 04/11/2009 3:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

As above I seem to be mainly 'no opinion'. I can hardly vote for 3 bike shops I've never been in, nor can I vote on best new bike when I haven't tried them. Best trail centre - I can vote for the one I've been to.

Do people just generally vote for whatever they think is most fashionable?

Where does the shortlist come from?


 
Posted : 04/11/2009 3:16 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

I cant believe the Big Bike Bash was an option for best event 🙁


 
Posted : 04/11/2009 3:21 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50593
 

[i]I cant believe the Big Bike Bash was an option for best event[/i]

I guess those who went didn't nominate it enough.


 
Posted : 04/11/2009 3:56 pm
Posts: 5942
Full Member
 

IS this a good time to open the trail centre vs trail debate ? [img] [/img]


 
Posted : 04/11/2009 4:28 pm
 Mark
Posts: 4423
 

I'd say it's a perfect time 🙂

Debate away 🙂


 
Posted : 04/11/2009 4:43 pm
 GEDA
Posts: 1631
Free Member
 

Whats the point?

How can you have a readers award with only three things in each category? To be totally cynical, but probably hopefully wrong, it all looks like some advertising rubbish. I have honestly never seen in the flesh any of the choices never mind used them and I doubt many of the people on here have either.

Well at least it will look dum when the results come out.. and the winner is "I have no opinion."


 
Posted : 06/11/2009 9:33 am
Posts: 613
Full Member
 

Isn't the point that we, the Singletrack Readership, nominated the items in each category. I sent a nomination in, and a number of those I nominated are in the final list. That means I can vote for things I do have experience of. I assume that only nominated things got into the categories, so some people on here must have wanted to see them included.


 
Posted : 06/11/2009 9:50 am
 Drac
Posts: 50593
 

[i]How can you have a readers award with only three things in each category?[/i]

As that's the final nominations from the ones readers nominated, you did nominate didn't you?


 
Posted : 06/11/2009 9:52 am
Posts: 5942
Full Member
 

OK, how does Lee Quarry hope to compete in the category of Best Trail Center given your criteria :-

[i]Best UK Trail Centre
Which trail center has given you the best blend of fantastic riding, facilities and overall enjoyment in the past year?[/i]

Given that description, I would have thought that you are precluding some of the best man made stuff around. The award will no doubt go to Glentress again, not because of just the trails, but it has a cafe, bike shop, showers etc etc.

All I was suggesting was maybe a category of best man made trail (not center) which would open things up for the like of Gisburn, Penmachno, Lee Qaurry etc etc...

I dont buy the line that "this maybe the incentive they need to build better facilities". Personally, I would much rather see the money spent on more trails rather that a posh cafe serving overpriced coffee.

Anyway, thats my 2 cents... I;m sure everyone will rightly have their own opinion.


 
Posted : 06/11/2009 9:56 am
Posts: 613
Full Member
 

lowey, isn't it up to those who are voting to assess what they see as the most important elements of that category. Fantastic riding comes well above anything else for me, so I voted with that in mind. That's the point, surely.


 
Posted : 06/11/2009 10:00 am
 Drac
Posts: 50593
 

Good point Lowey but yet it still made it to the final 3, Glentress is hugely popular so nearly always wins. I voted for Lee Quarry as what it has done in such a small area is very impressive and has made good use of land that was pretty much wasted.


 
Posted : 06/11/2009 10:00 am
Posts: 6382
Free Member
 

All I was suggesting was maybe a category of best man made trail (not center) which would open things up for the like of Gisburn, Penmachno, Lee Qaurry etc etc...

Most of the trails ie bridleways etc in this country are manmade. Purpose built would be a better category name in my opinion, or better still, would be a worthwhile addition as a new category. I've ridden some cracking purpose built stuff this year that wouldn't (shouldn't) get a look in in the existing category due to lack of facilities.


 
Posted : 06/11/2009 10:07 am
 mt
Posts: 48
Free Member
 

18 bikes by what measure is it better than loads of other shops in the country?


 
Posted : 06/11/2009 10:59 am
Posts: 1772
Topic starter
 

MT - people sent in lots of nominations for it. Is that a satisfactory measure for it? 🙂


 
Posted : 06/11/2009 11:02 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]people sent in lots of nominations for it[/i]

Roughly speaking how many nominations is 'lots'. I'd be interested to know how many nominations it takes to get on the shortlist.

Does anyone take these nominations seriously apart from the winners? By that I mean would it sway you in any way to buy a product. Or is it just a bit of fun?


 
Posted : 06/11/2009 11:43 am
 Sim
Posts: 3
Full Member
 

[i]Does anyone take these nominations seriously apart from the winners? By that I mean would it sway you in any way to buy a product. Or is it just a bit of fun?[/i]

On a website dedicated to riding bicycles over hills in the mud whilst wearing lycra and polystyrene seriousness is pretty realtive 🙂


 
Posted : 06/11/2009 12:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So thats a 'no' then.


 
Posted : 06/11/2009 12:14 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50593
 

[i]I'd be interested to know how many nominations it takes to get on the shortlist.[/i]

More than those that didn't make it is my guess.


 
Posted : 06/11/2009 12:14 pm
 wors
Posts: 3796
Full Member
 

I'd be interested to know how many nominations it takes to get on the shortlist.

why?


 
Posted : 06/11/2009 12:15 pm
Posts: 23337
Full Member
 

Aren’t people reading a bit too much into this?

If the shortlist is dictated by a website user's secret ballot and you disagree with the outcome then I’m afraid it’s tough.

Recognition from your peers is nice and means a lot more to some people than others. Me, Terrahawk, TheOriginalPunkRockDad and RammyRunner made it to the final three last year and winning the trophy would have meant an awful lot to us. As it happens we lost out to the World’s at Fort William and the UCI didn’t send anybody to Hebden Bridge on a wet Friday night to pick up the prize. We went, we had a good time and we had a chat to the chaps from the mag and a few other people. We got over it.

Would an award to Ragley mean more to them than it would to Garmin or Specialized?... Dunno.


 
Posted : 06/11/2009 12:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Hmmm, so why bother with voting on the shortlist at all..... surely the item with the most nominations for a given category is the winner in that category?


 
Posted : 06/11/2009 12:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]why?[/i]

Eh cause I was just wondering, nothing sinister. Is that okay?


 
Posted : 06/11/2009 12:32 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50593
 

[i]Hmmm, so why bother with voting on the shortlist at all..... surely the item with the most nominations for a given category is the winner in that category? [/i]

Yes your right and the whole process should be changed at once for all awards done this way. 🙄


 
Posted : 06/11/2009 12:34 pm
Posts: 23337
Full Member
 

Hmmm, so why bother with voting on the shortlist at all..... surely the item with the most nominations for a given category is the winner in that category?

You have to have a shortlist for the final round of voting, and to be impartial the shortlist has to be created by the voting public. If the result was entirely down to the nomination ballot where would the fun be?

I don’t know why I’m sticking up for them as I didn’t win and it still gnaws away at my innards despite what I said earlier. Clearly, as my Gran used to say, the whole thing is a giant bloody swizz. 😉 Or maybe it is a bit of fun that is in danger of turning into a pain in the arse for them because of people arguing the toss.


 
Posted : 06/11/2009 12:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Drac - no need for sarcasm.

You have to have a shortlist for the final round of voting

That's what I wondered about. Why? What's the flaw with one user, one nomination per category, winner is the thing with the most nominations (ie. votes). What purpose does the final round of voting serve? genuinely curious.


 
Posted : 06/11/2009 1:00 pm
Page 1 / 2