Forum menu

[Closed] 1x9

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#3911572]

My chainrings on my XT triple need replacing and looking at the price i am wondering if i should go 1x9. I am riding a Giant Anthem X mainly xc racing and local trails with an 11 32 rear block. Having always had a double or triple I am looking for advice before deciding either way.


 
Posted : 25/04/2012 2:13 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

I've gone triple with a 36 front and 11 32 rear on 9 speed.

I think if it was a bike I did long days on I'd go for a 34 at the front.

You will need a new front ring plus some sort of chain device so you may find a set of triple rings aren't much different in price?


 
Posted : 25/04/2012 2:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Try riding your trails in the middle ring only see if you can manage. me I need gears from 22/34 granny to 36 / 11 top to cope with my riding style / fitness / terrain

You could always just put cheap chainrings on. Deore work wll


 
Posted : 25/04/2012 2:18 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

I've gone triple with a 36 front and 11 32 rear on 9 speed.

Assume you mean single? 😕

I run 36t with an 11-36 1x10 for racing, and love it. Not sure I'd be as keen with an 11-32 block though, more limiting.


 
Posted : 25/04/2012 2:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Try riding your trails in the middle ring only see if you can manage it.

Do this.


 
Posted : 25/04/2012 2:29 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

yes, single sorry...


 
Posted : 25/04/2012 2:32 pm
Posts: 6332
Free Member
 

I have gone 1x9 and wouldn't go back.

Even for big days in the Lakes it's fine. I run a 32 ring and 11-34 though. I tried a 34 ring and 11-32 but it wasn't low enough for the really steep stuff.


 
Posted : 25/04/2012 2:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've thought about 1x9 recently mainly riding peaks which has some steep bits would a 32 front and 11x34 at back be enough to get me to top and the to bottom,


 
Posted : 25/04/2012 2:53 pm
Posts: 18196
Full Member
 

I have a 1x9 setup. I use a 32t at the front and a 12-36t at the back, but then I'm pushing a burly 6" bike and I don't ride xc enough to be super-fit. Well, thats my excuse anyway...


 
Posted : 25/04/2012 3:06 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

would a 32 front and 11x34 at back be enough to get me to top and the to bottom,

How are we supposed to know?!

I'm thinking of buying some size 43 shoes, will they fit?


 
Posted : 25/04/2012 3:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

njee20 people may no if that set up would be a struggle to ride up anything steep.

Shoe analogy not incredibly helpful.


 
Posted : 25/04/2012 3:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

njee20 people may no if that set up would be a struggle to ride up anything steep.

well...one person's 'steep' is another person's medium gradient. you only need to look at any drops/jumps thread to see the wide range of perceptions and experiences on here.


 
Posted : 25/04/2012 3:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I wasn't sure if it would work for where and how I ride but I decided to try it anyway... and I can report that it mostly works but sometimes doesn't... but I like it anyway... ymmv etc.

As a friend of mine once said... the only way to trully [u]know[/u] you don't like man love is to try it... 😳


 
Posted : 25/04/2012 3:50 pm
Posts: 3394
Full Member
 

32/11 x 32 on the hard tail, i just stopped using the 22/44 for a while and then ditched them.
What you could do is ditch the front mech and shifter but leave the 22 ring on. If you get in to trouble and need a get up/home for free card you could shift by hand.


 
Posted : 25/04/2012 3:56 pm
Posts: 14166
Full Member
 

Works for me - easy enough to test by leaving your bike in the middle ring for a few weeks of riding.


 
Posted : 25/04/2012 3:56 pm
Posts: 0
 

+1 for Speshpaul's comment.

Use your heel to kick-down.

If you do not use it in a few rides, remove it.

Simples and cheap.

PaulD


 
Posted : 25/04/2012 4:39 pm
 IA
Posts: 563
Free Member
 

People singlespeed fine. 1x9 will be/is fine.

Sometimes you just have to summon the power of grayskull/strength of the bear (delete as applicable) to get up something, mostly it's fine. But it does entirely depend on your personal level of fitness and strength.


 
Posted : 25/04/2012 4:46 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

njee20 people may no if that set up would be a struggle to ride up anything steep.

I've never had to walk anything that I could've ridden with a smaller chainring. In fact I've not had to walk anything since going 1x10. Won't be the case for everyone though, hence my shoe analogy.


 
Posted : 25/04/2012 4:51 pm
Posts: 6332
Free Member
 

Sometimes you just have to summon the power of grayskull/strength of the bear (delete as applicable) to get up something, mostly it's fine. But it does entirely depend on your personal level of fitness and strength.

...and the length of the climb. I can get up pretty much anything on 1x9 that I could with a granny but longer climbs become quite a bit harder. So terrain is an issue.


 
Posted : 25/04/2012 4:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

34 chainring & 34-11 cassette here on my light-ish short-forked hardtail.

Fine for most things.

I used to singlespeed (2:1) the same bike back up some long, steep hills when I was fitter, so a mere 1:1 feels fine in most situations.

I do have the same plus a granny ring fitted my heavy full-susser.


 
Posted : 25/04/2012 4:59 pm
Posts: 11937
Free Member
 

Back In the Day™, a typical granny gear was a 28:28. I rode steep stuff on that when I was a teenager.

As long as your biggest sprocket matches your chainring, you should be able to ride almost anything.


 
Posted : 25/04/2012 5:06 pm
Posts: 2425
Free Member
 

miketually - Member

Back In the Day™, a typical granny gear was a 28:28. I rode steep stuff on that when I was a teenager.

As long as your biggest sprocket matches your chainring, you should be able to ride almost anything

I have found this to be true


 
Posted : 25/04/2012 5:15 pm