Column: Weight For It

ColumnSingletrack Magazine

by 9

Benji argues that weight does matter (but not much). The following column will hopefully unite the warring tribes in mountain biking. From the weeniest of weight watchers, to the whatever-est of funtime trail riders, everyone should be able to get behind the following words. Essentially, I think – no, I know – that bike weight matters. I also believe – and know – that it doesn’t matter very much. Certainly not significantly for most riders…

There's more to this story

But it's a member-only story

Join us to unlock it and more

Singletrack magazine has been in print and and online since 2001 and every issue we’ve ever published is made available to our members as part of their membership. But there’s so much more on offer – check out these features.

From unlimited access to content to discounts and offers on gear and services. All full membership comes with unlimited digital access & ad free website. But we also need your help to survive and be a sustainable media brand. Advertising just doesn't pay the bills anymore but members contributions do. The more of you join us the better we can be so we hope you'll take a look at the options below and if you can, join us and help sustain the future of Singletrack.

Join us

Full Member Benefits

DIGITAL

Access all our digital benefits

  • Access members’ content, digital back issues & new app issues
  • Ad free website ***
  • Merch discounts.
  • Downloads, GPX, PDFs, iBooks
  • Choose your own price*
  • Choose annual (best value) or bi-monthly (flexible)
£29/year

Or

£7.99 every 2 months

PRINT+

Singletrack in gorgeous print + digital

  • Access members’ content, digital back issues & new app issues
  • Ad free website ***
  • Merch discounts.
  • Downloads, GPX, PDFs, iBooks
  • Choose your own price*
  • Choose annual (best value) or bi-monthly (flexible)
£49/year

Or

£8.99 every 2 months

*You can help support Singletrack by adding a little bit extra on your annual renewal.

Author Profile Picture

Orange Switch 6er. Stif Squatcher. Schwalbe Magic Mary Purple Addix front. Maxxis DHR II 3C MaxxTerra rear. Coil fan. Ebikes are not evil. I have been a writer for nigh on 20 years, a photographer for 25 years and a mountain biker for 30 years. I have written countless magazine and website features and route guides for the UK mountain bike press, most notably for the esteemed and highly regarded Singletrackworld. Although I am a Lancastrian, I freely admit that West Yorkshire is my favourite place to ride. Rarely a week goes by without me riding and exploring the South Pennines.

More posts from Ben

Home › Forums › Column: Weight For It

Overview Chat Bike Members News Women
Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Column: Weight For It
  • 1
    sargey2003
    Full Member

    Pretty much agree with all this, but (keeping with the programme) you don’t always need DH casings, so you can still have decent tyres that make life a little easier.

    Posted 1 year ago
    oldnick
    Full Member

    My main thing is how efficient the bike feels. Unfortunately I had a Pivot Mach5.7 carbon, which for me combined magic carpet ride with no apparent bob when standing up. Nothing else has come close since despite lighter bikes, bigger wheels, slacker geo.

     

    Posted 1 year ago
    3
    weeksy
    Full Member

    My bike is red. Everyone knows red bikes trump all others. Weight, heck I’m many stone heavier than Schurter, hence him being quicker.

    Posted 1 year ago
    LAT
    Full Member

    As soon as you introduce some sort of metric into your hobby, you’ve lost. You’ve turned it into a competitive sport. It’s become about Other People rather than You.

    well phrased and i completely agree, though i do like to know how much elevation gain there is in my rides.

    you don’t always need DH casings, so you can still have decent tyres that make life a little easier

    yep, it depends how heavy your tyres were to begin with. that said,  bigger and sturdier tyres feel much more comfortable and sure footed when descending rough trails.

     

    Posted 1 year ago
    1
    scotroutes
    Full Member

    As soon as you introduce some sort of metric into your hobby, you’ve lost. You’ve turned it into a competitive sport. It’s become about Other People rather than You.

    Well, that’s complete bollocks for a start. I’m very interested in the numbers but I don’t give a shit about how they compare to someone else’s numbers.

    And the main thing about a lighter bike is that it takes less energy to go a given distance, meaning you can go further on any given amount of energy. Of course, there’s a point at which fatigue becomes an issue and comfort often comes at the expense of weight so the equations change. The range of bikes being used for the likes of the HT550 shows how different folks have tried to weigh up those choices.

    Posted 1 year ago
    steamtb
    Full Member

    I veer towards the longevity and comfort side of the equation on my heavy (by many standards) enduro bike. Pretty heavy tyres and inserts means I can run pressures that allow me to do a day at places like Dyfi, taking some big hits to my wheels and still feel pretty fresh and with an intact bike at the end of the day, coil shock adds weight too. My friend on his super light carbon bike, not so much. It also translates to all day rides that have ups and long downs, it’s a happy place for me and my bike. The bike flows really nicely on jump lines and downhills, although how much is due to or in spite of the weight, who knows. 🙂

    Posted 1 year ago
    LAT
    Full Member

    Well, that’s complete bollocks for a start. I’m very interested in the numbers but I don’t give a shit about how they compare to someone else’s numbers.

    a fair point, grumpily made (wink)

    The range of bikes being used for the likes of the HT550 shows how different folks have tried to weigh up those choices.

    what is an example of a typical winning bike? or is it dependant on the conditions or the preference of the person who wins that year.

    i know what the HT550 is, but beyond that i’m completely ignorant, other than it being a long way from my kind of mountain biking.

    i once talked to a guy in a bike shop who’d just done the race that follows the rocky mountains (great divide?). i didn’t ask where he finished, but his bike wasn’t light. a steel 29+. though i’d imagine for comfort and reliability.

    Posted 1 year ago
    pauldavey22
    Full Member

    I have to many friends that are or have spolit perfectly good rides, when chasing their own “Metric” which I’ve now learnt to ignore, it does make me laugh how much they can put themselves down for not getting the KOM etc.

    I much prefer the head up approach, see what’s around you and enjoy the ride. This is something I’ve definitely realised with a recent riding visit to  Snowdon with Wildbikes.

    What a epic view!

    Posted 1 year ago
    jmmtb
    Full Member

    One point, often missed in weight debates, is that in the (my) real world of mountain biking in actual mountains we quite often have to carry our bikes, or at least lift them over multiple obstacles. Weight may not make much difference when pedalling at a constant pace, but it sure does when you have to hump your bike up onto your shoulders or over a gate.

    Posted 1 year ago
Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Overview Chat Bike Members News Women