Home Forums Chat Forum Riding two abreast on a two-lane road: yay or nay? (video)

Viewing 40 posts - 281 through 320 (of 479 total)
  • Riding two abreast on a two-lane road: yay or nay? (video)
  • aracer
    Free Member

    I get annoyed with all inconsiderate people on the roads.

    Now I really am getting concerned about who I share my POV with 😉

    aracer
    Free Member

    glitchy bump

    nick1962
    Free Member

    Not read the whole thread but think I agree with TJ.Never ridden two abreast but if the outer bike is in the middle of the lane then what’s the problem?
    I ride alone and always occupy the middle of my lane. I am a unit of traffic so why shouldn’t I?
    I believe I am safer , more visible and twunts in cars wont try overtaking me unless the oncoming lane is completely clear and so they leave me more room and do so safely. Would the van driver have stopped and lectured any other slow moving vehicle ie a bus,tractor, police car etc Can’t believe so many posts on a cycling forum arguing against this?

    martinxyz
    Free Member

    I need to steer clear of this thread. I am now picturing Muddydwarf keeping arms length from the kerb yet still managing to catch the pedals on it.

    oldgit
    Free Member

    oldgit – you’ve not been killed yet? You are incredibly lucky.

    Why?
    That’s not in the gutter. 50cm is far enough out to clear gutters etc. And I ride in a predictable manner i.e straight and smooth so cars can pass with ease.
    I’d say riding in the middle of the lane, right or wrong simply winds up drivers and giving them too much to think about seems to make matters worse.

    And I’ve put it into practice cycling from north of Hemel Hempstead into North London in all weathers for years.
    I suppose I ride like I ride with a road club.

    GlitterGary
    Free Member

    So, to sum ip the TJ’s opinion on this thread: It’s legal to be a dick, either on the roads or the Internet, therefore it’s ok to be a dick. That pretty much sums it up?

    TandemJeremy
    Free Member

    No – not at all. it is safer to ride defensivly in accordance with cyclecraft and other advise on defensive riding so why not do so?

    Ride in the gutter and increase your danger.

    Why be in more danger than yo need to be by poor road positioning.

    Its sad how many supposed cyclists on here think you should get out of the way of cars and cower in an unsafe road position in the gutter

    cynic-al
    Free Member

    Oldgit I was joking…a lost art on here it seems…

    GlitterGary
    Free Member

    After 8 pages, no one has said it is ok to ride in the gutter. TJ, you need to see a psychiatrist as you seem to have these voices in your head making up arguments that don’t exist. Other than that you seem like a nice enough fellow.

    TandemJeremy
    Free Member

    You have and have others. You want bike riders to get out of the way of cars by riding far to close to the kerb and you have said this several times

    GlitterGary
    Free Member

    Ok then. I never realised. Thank you.

    TandemJeremy
    Free Member

    GlitterGary
    “Bikes have to get out of the way of cars do they?”

    Yes, of course they do, when they are holding up traffic by driving selfishly

    GlitterGary
    Free Member

    And gutters are mentioned where?

    donsimon
    Free Member

    Did anyone see Kevin’s Grand Design where he nearly took the cyclist out?
    Talking to camera.
    Taffic island.
    Overtake cyclist.
    Surely a law must have been broken there, no?

    IanMunro
    Free Member

    I missed that, though I had a wry smile through the bit when he was so enamoured by that ‘one day’ marketing bollocks and read out the ‘one day I will cycle to work’, followed by yet another section when he’s gabbling away to a TV camera whilst driving to work.

    donsimon
    Free Member

    when he was so enamoured by that ‘one day’ marketing bollocks and read out the ‘one day I will cycle to work’

    The marketing guff was funny as is the outside storage rack for bicycles. NOT!

    warton
    Free Member

    sometimes when threads like this go backwards and forwards, relentlessly it’s probably best to agree to disagree, you know?

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    One problem with threads like this is that TJ is so vociferous that other folk who support his position can’t get a word in edgeways! As a result it can often seem like an “everyone against TJ” thread.

    To add some “science” I’ve done a brief audit of the thread and tried to categorise where people stand on riding two-abreast along that stretch of road (or in general):

    FOR

    GrahamS
    TJ
    The Southern Yeti
    coffeeking
    psling
    PeterPoddy
    Rockplough
    warton
    stumpy01
    poly
    aracer
    KungFuPanda
    bencooper
    scu98rkr
    Omar Little
    richmtb
    teamhurtmore
    stevehine
    2tyred
    antigee
    oldgit
    AdamW
    Junkyard
    Surrounded By Zulus
    imnotverygood
    nick1962

    AGAINST

    theflatboy
    GlitterGary
    5thElefant
    IanMunro
    martinxyz
    themountaingoat
    geordiemick00
    theprawn
    camo16
    mega
    rewski
    kaesae
    molgrips
    BoardinBob
    MTB Rob
    user-removed
    FeeFoo
    Dickyboy
    cynic-al
    zippykona
    MrSalmon
    edhornby
    trailmonkey
    v8ninety

    UNDECIDED

    Cougar
    wrightyson
    DezB
    hora
    rickmeister
    mansonsoul
    thomthumb
    project
    b r
    mrmo
    nealglover
    AlexSimon
    PJM1974
    redthunder
    singletrackmind
    grantway
    HoratioHufnagel
    starrman82
    grahamh
    Woody
    thegreatape

    Totals: 26 FOR, 24 AGAINST, 21 UNDECIDED.

    Seems to be a remarkably even split so far.
    No wonder the thread has rolled on so long.

    (Apologies if I have misread anyone’s position. It wasn’t always that clear, hence “undecided” includes anyone that I wasn’t sure what their position was as well as those who expressly said they weren’t sure.)

    The interesting point is that (almost) everyone cites “safety” as the main concern, which is good. It seems the core disagreement is about which is the safer approach.

    cynic-al
    Free Member

    I doubt we’ll see that in our TJ’s lifetime, warton 😛

    cynic-al
    Free Member

    and GrahamS what on earth do you think you are doing with your well researched and rational approach? 😀

    GlitterGary
    Free Member

    😆 Excellent!

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    tree-unnert!!

    (I think the main problem is we haven’t had Elfin here to tell us the correct answer)

    nealglover
    Free Member

    I’m not undecided.

    I’m against, the two guys in the vid were riding like ****.
    I just couldn’t be bothered with it really.

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    Fair enough neal.
    Totals: 26 FOR, 25 AGAINST, 20 UNDECIDED.

    mansonsoul
    Free Member

    GrahamS, sorry, I’m clearly not making myself clear, I have self-flaggelated in repentance.

    I’ve decided cyclists two abreast is awesome, and those dudes seem to me to be perfectly in the right.

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    mansonsoul: that’s okay. Say ten Hail TJs and go in peace.

    Totals: 27 FOR, 25 AGAINST, 19 UNDECIDED.

    mansonsoul
    Free Member

    Hallelujah! 🙂

    teamhurtmore
    Free Member

    An excellent way to conclude. Now we dont need to hit 400!

    psling
    Free Member

    Say ten Hail TJs…

    😆 just picturing TJ as Mary trying to argdebate away that pregnancy… 😆

    Dickyboy
    Full Member

    So only 25 out of 71 are right then 😉

    psling
    Free Member

    Shirley everyone is right 8)

    Milkie
    Free Member

    If he walked up to me like that, trying to strut his stuff, I would’ve knocked the **** out, no hesitation.

    … But I wouldn’t be riding 2 a breast on a busy road, just cos it’s legal, doesn’t make it right.

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    just cos it’s legal, doesn’t make it right.

    I don’t think anyone has tried to claim that, but new vote noted Milkie:

    Totals: 27 FOR, 26 AGAINST, 19 UNDECIDED.

    stevehine
    Full Member

    @oldgit – you seem to have had almost the exact opposite experience as me – I used to ride as you suggest ~50 – 70cm away from the kerb – sadly for me; a bus decided to squeeze past as we were approaching a traffic island then moved across as the road narrowed; he was still only half way past having clearly misjudged my speed. 6 months of painful dental surgery later and I now sport a nice set of implants instead of my own front teeth.

    I will now take up a more prominent (I guess primary; though I’ve not read that book / used the terminology before) whenever I feel that to allow cars to pass / squeeze by would put myself at risk – since adopting that approach; I’ve had the odd confrontation with people who seem to think I’ve no right to take up any space – but no one has driven into me or forced me off the road.

    I’m sure others have similar experiences; and I’m sure others have had bad experiences by adopting a wider road position – but I thought I would at least explain my reasoning (do I get extra marks for showing my working out ? :D)

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    Can all the pro 2 abreasters vouch that they have never got upset with caravans or tractors when they are impeded in their cars.

    what other road users dare to use the road when I am there the Bastards. TBH I save my rage for horses or is it hearses [spelling is not my strong point] do these people not know who I am and that I have somewhere to go… i m ean uses roads when i want to but going slower than i want to its just unfair and inconsiderate – they should obviously consider mine as it would be stupid to think i should consider their needs.

    It’s legal to be a dick, either on the roads or the Internet, therefore it’s ok to be a dick. That pretty much sums it up?

    no it is legal to misrepresent peoples point of view and act like a dick yourself whilst calling someone else a dick – you may not agree but surely you can work out his view is a safety one

    you need to see a psychiatrist as you seem to have these voices in your head making up arguments that don’t exist

    and yet no one used the words you used either Gary – physician heal thyself
    Stw never ceases to amaze me with it lack of self awareness

    IanMunro
    Free Member

    I’m sure others have similar experiences; and I’m sure others have had bad experiences by adopting a wider road position – but I thought I would at least explain my reasoning (do I get extra marks for showing my working out ? :D)

    You do 😀
    I think the simple answer is there is not a one size fits all position in the road.
    If I’m reasonably confident that the vehicles behind are probably aware of my presence, then I also ride out in the manner you’ve suggested for the same reasons. So yes, in general I move out if I need to control a situation.
    However, I can think of a couple of times when I’ve been on a fast straight open A roads, and cars have brushed past so close (i.e. wing mirror clipping me) with no hint of change of road position, that I’m pretty confident that the driver just wasn’t looking out of the windscreen at the time.
    Had I adopted the middle of the road as the default position in those occurrences, I’m pretty certain I’d have been smashed to bits.

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    *considers moving IanMunro to Undecided*

    IanMunro
    Free Member

    I think you need to rename the categories Black, White and Grey.
    Move me to the Grey, then start a debate on which viewpoint is Black and which is White 🙂

    druidh
    Free Member

    IanMunro – Member
    Had I adopted the middle of the road as the default position in those occurrences, I’m pretty certain I’d have been smashed to bits.

    I’ve always been of the belief that a driver is more likely to see you the further our in the road you are. In addition ( think the point has already been made above?), if it’s a queue of following vehicles, anyone behind the first vehicle is going to come across you very suddenly and unexpectedly if the first vehicle isn’t forced to slow down/indicate.

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    Incidentally, a few people have mentioned only moving into the primary when you need to control the situation, for example when approaching a turn.

    In the vid they are approaching a roundabout, so isn’t that a good reason to take control?

Viewing 40 posts - 281 through 320 (of 479 total)

The topic ‘Riding two abreast on a two-lane road: yay or nay? (video)’ is closed to new replies.