One problem with threads like this is that TJ is so vociferous that other folk who support his position can’t get a word in edgeways! As a result it can often seem like an “everyone against TJ” thread.
To add some “science” I’ve done a brief audit of the thread and tried to categorise where people stand on riding two-abreast along that stretch of road (or in general):
FOR
GrahamS
TJ
The Southern Yeti
coffeeking
psling
PeterPoddy
Rockplough
warton
stumpy01
poly
aracer
KungFuPanda
bencooper
scu98rkr
Omar Little
richmtb
teamhurtmore
stevehine
2tyred
antigee
oldgit
AdamW
Junkyard
Surrounded By Zulus
imnotverygood
nick1962
AGAINST
theflatboy
GlitterGary
5thElefant
IanMunro
martinxyz
themountaingoat
geordiemick00
theprawn
camo16
mega
rewski
kaesae
molgrips
BoardinBob
MTB Rob
user-removed
FeeFoo
Dickyboy
cynic-al
zippykona
MrSalmon
edhornby
trailmonkey
v8ninety
UNDECIDED
Cougar
wrightyson
DezB
hora
rickmeister
mansonsoul
thomthumb
project
b r
mrmo
nealglover
AlexSimon
PJM1974
redthunder
singletrackmind
grantway
HoratioHufnagel
starrman82
grahamh
Woody
thegreatape
Totals: 26 FOR, 24 AGAINST, 21 UNDECIDED.
Seems to be a remarkably even split so far.
No wonder the thread has rolled on so long.
(Apologies if I have misread anyone’s position. It wasn’t always that clear, hence “undecided” includes anyone that I wasn’t sure what their position was as well as those who expressly said they weren’t sure.)
The interesting point is that (almost) everyone cites “safety” as the main concern, which is good. It seems the core disagreement is about which is the safer approach.