Forum menu
Jeremy Clarkson, cy...
 

[Closed] Jeremy Clarkson, cycling in London....

Posts: 0
Full Member
Topic starter
 
[#5907781]

[url= http://www.****/tvshowbiz/article-2548802/Top-Gear-switches-low-gear-hosts-Jeremy-Clarkson-James-May-experience-streets-London-cyclists.html ]Looks like his bosses have suggested he needs to try it out himself!
[/url]


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 8:33 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Impressed that singletrack does not allow direct links to the Daily mail! Keep up the good work.


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 8:37 am
Posts: 12
Free Member
 

Embarrassed the STW doesn't allow links to the DM. It'd be understandable if it was for the Grauniad. The readers tend to wear sandals and socks (at the same time), be vegan and be complete A-holes.

Two things from the article.

1. "I don’t mind if cyclists want to come on the road with their silly Victorian distractions, I’m not bothered, but they must behave themselves."

2. Woohoo. Top Gear on Sunday!

re. #1. They're not silly, but you can't argue with the sentiment. All road users should behave themselves.

re. #2. Woohoo!!!


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 8:42 am
Posts: 4434
Free Member
 

That's the first article I've seen in a while that seems to be a bit of 'healthy debate'. It's probably the DM's hatred of cyclists AND Clarkson that's caused it, but the more this topic is discussed in the media, the better, as far as I'm concerned.


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 8:49 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I agree with #1 - behave on the road or face the consequences the same as other road users.
The number of people on here who spout sanctimonious shite about RLJ, positioning, etc then whinge when a car drive for biker is a millimeter in "the wrong place" .....
On the road? Then you get the same penalties REGARDLESS of what form of transport you use....


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 8:50 am
 ps44
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/10602753/Top-Gear-most-watched-BBC-iPlayer-programme-of-2013.html

This made me laugh. The BBC/Guardianista luvvies must be choking on their soya lattes that the filthy hoi polloi prefer this over the PC multi culti drivel that makes up most of the output.


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 8:53 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Embarrassed the STW doesn't allow links to the DM. It'd be understandable if it was for the Grauniad. The readers tend to wear sandals and socks (at the same time), be vegan and be complete A-holes.

As opposed to the closed minded, racist, homophobes that read the Mail? Whilst the guardian is the wet lettuce of news papers, at least it's not full of bile and venom targeted at anyone who isn't middle class white British. It is the epitome of gutter journalism and thrives on perpetuating fear and hatred of anything unfamiliar or unknown.


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 9:14 am
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

just posted a thread about the producer being interviewed on bbc radio 2 talking about clarkson/hammond filming yesterday.


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 9:19 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

As far as I can see STW does allow links to the Mail, just not direct links.

The thing about behaving themselves, problem is that there are lots of different views on what that entails.


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 9:26 am
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

pulled from my parallel thread closed:
Just heard Evans interviewing the producer of Top Gear, part of the interview mentioned that Hammond and Clarkson where seen cycling in London yesterday and the question was what were they doing? The answer was filming a 'public information' type film about cycling... I think we should not be happy about this but frankly get ready to go to war with the BBC. Clarkson on a bike can only mean sarcasm as the king of cars MISINFORMATION for the drivers of the world.


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 9:28 am
 MSP
Posts: 15842
Free Member
 

The BBC/Guardianista luvvies must be choking on their soya lattes that the filthy hoi polloi prefer this over the PC multi culti drivel that makes up most of the output.

Clarkson is one of the BBC's main "luvvies" you must be really really incredibly stupid to not realise that.


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 9:37 am
Posts: 151
Free Member
 

Clarkson on a scooter in vietnam was the finest TV for a generation. On a bike in London should be good too...


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 9:38 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think we should not be happy about this but frankly get ready to go to war with the BBC. Clarkson on a bike can only mean sarcasm as the king of cars MISINFORMATION for the drivers of the world.

Maybe wait till the program is aired before jumping to conclusions?


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 9:44 am
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

jumping to conclusions

hahaha... based on his twitter storm last week I dont think its a leap in imagination to see where it goes.


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 9:48 am
Posts: 151
Free Member
 

Now you know why he started the 'storm'.


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 9:51 am
Posts: 28593
Free Member
 

'Public information film for cyclists'? Can't see a lot of balance creeping into that, particularly after Clarkson's recent twitter spat. I do wonder if the whole issue has prompted this as a late addition to this run of Top Gear, given that it's being filmed and edited even as the first show goes to air.

Happy to be proved wrong, though.


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 9:53 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

based on his twitter storm last week I dont think its a leap in imagination to see where it goes

While Jeremy may be anti cycling in London both May and Hammond are avid cyclists so the way the piece is produced will no doubt cast Clarkson as the bad guy but the tone of the piece may also highlight cycling using May and Hammond to counteract Clarksons oafish behaviour.

With Top Gear being one of the biggest programs the BBC has the exposure could do cycling good.


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 9:54 am
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

you guys are way more optimistic about Clarkson than me... I'll go get a beer and see if it helps even at this hour.


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 9:56 am
Posts: 1980
Free Member
 

I think people really do not see that Clarkson has a persona that exists to sell copy. Look at his charity work. I believe that is the the true man.

Would I play a part that brought me riches? Damn sure I would. No different than any other actor.


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 9:58 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I read the Guardian and like Top Gear - do I win a prize?

STW's blocking of DM links is great - it's a hateful publication that doesn't need the oxygen of any more publicity.


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 10:02 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Well I'll look forward to the Cycling programme they do, rather feel it'll be part of a Top Gear insertion myself but non the less I sit in anticipation waiting to watch Jezzer and Hamster riding thorugh Lonjon.

Wonder if they'll pop into Rapha for a coffee??


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 10:03 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Clarkson is a parody of himself IMHO. I used to enjoy his books but stopped getting them a long time ago. He doesn't really bother me, but I can understand why he irritates some.


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 10:07 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

please no more [s]Lance[/s] Jeremy threads - please make it stop


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 10:08 am
Posts: 28593
Free Member
 

both May and Hammond are avid cyclists so the way the piece is produced will no doubt cast Clarkson as the bad guy but the tone of the piece may also highlight cycling using May and Hammond to counteract Clarksons oafish behaviour.

They may be singing from similar hymn sheets in some respects though.

http://www.topgear.com/uk/richard-hammond/Richard-on-cyclists-2013-09-30


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 10:10 am
Posts: 16210
Free Member
 

I think people really do not see that Clarkson has a persona that exists to sell copy. Look at his charity work. I believe that is the the true man.

I'm sure he's kind to animals, too. Did you forget the bit about cheating on his wife with his ex, then taking out a super-injunction against her?


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 10:15 am
Posts: 3676
Full Member
 

martinhutch - Member
'Public information film for cyclists'?

Funny that, I heard the interview and don't remember Andy Wilman saying anything about a public information film for cyclists.
He did say they were making a public information film like the ones that the government used to make but didn't say anything about it being [i]FOR[/i] cyclists.


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 10:18 am
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

Look at his charity work. I believe that is the the true man.

It such a big part of him there is no mention on wiki- I can only assume this is because he shuns publicity

As for clarkson I find it reprehensible that he says stuff he does not believe in just to make money and idiots adore him when he is essentially mocking them

He has a platform and people actually listen to him and revere what he says. He could use this for good or for profit. i believe that is what we should judge him on not his "charity" work.
It is unlikely to make cycling safer but lets keep our fingers crossed


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 10:18 am
Posts: 551
Free Member
 

Jeremy tweeted: 'It's weird to have so many angry cyclists following me here. In real life, it's usually the other way round.'

I'm afraid that is undeniably funny 😆


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 10:21 am
Posts: 151
Free Member
 

As for clarkson I find it reprehensible that he says stuff he does not believe in just to make money and idiots adore him when he is essentially mocking them

No, he's mocking [i]you[/i] which is why he's adorable. 😀


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 10:22 am
Posts: 932
Full Member
 

I heard the interview too, did I really hear Andy willman 'jokingly'talk about a road sweeper going past may and hammond and missing the chance to take a sharp left turn, would seem to sum up the attitude generally! OTOH
James Toseland sounds a decent chap give him the gig?


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 10:29 am
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

Why is he mocking me ? Bit hard really as I dont watch or read his output and apart from STW I have no idea what he does or says tbh.
I accept he, like his followers, get a semi out of thinking they have annoyed folk and laughing at their great wit for doing this and I pity them both equally.

Its an endearing quality but easy

Apologies i did not think you/the fanboys were that stupid 😉
See


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 10:29 am
Posts: 151
Free Member
 

I accept he, like his followers, get a semi out of thinking they have annoyed folk and laughing at their great wit for doing this and I pity them both equally.

^This. The spluttering of the permaoffended brings me pleasure. Without you Clarkson couldn't exist.

I should thank you for doing your bit. Thanks.


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 10:34 am
Posts: 6754
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

Lycra on the ouside of jeans, labels still on the clothes.

I'd imagine he'll cycle around a bit then tell everyone to stay in the gutter "out of the cars way".


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 10:36 am
Posts: 3676
Full Member
 

Why is he mocking me ? Bit hard really as I dont watch or read his output and apart from STW I have no idea what he does or says tbh

How can you comment on him if you don't 'know' him (i.e. read/watch his output)

That makes you as bad as the daily mail readers who spout vitriol about stuff they've never seen or experienced.


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 10:39 am
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Lycra on the ouside of jeans, labels still on the clothes.

I assume you've never seen the show? That's sort of a running gag, notably the labels piece. They did the same in Shere when kitting up in track day cars in the rain.


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 10:41 am
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

The spluttering of the permaoffended brings me pleasure. Without you Clarkson couldn't exist.

So he could not exist without someoen who does not rea dhis stuff, but his books or watch his programmes....Logic really is your strong suit.
Are you so deluded you think the "permaoffended" are the ones who buy his books and read his columns and make him rich? Now i knew his fans were gullible but really are you this gullible/stupid?
I should thank you for doing your bit. Thanks.

Happy to help you get a semi at how rude and edgy you are * swoons

I think its strange you wish to offend and get excited by it as you try to get a rise from someone.

Happy days upsetting folk...I wish you luck.


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 10:44 am
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

How can you comment on him if you don't 'know' him

Good point if it was what i said

Nice use of the DM to get a reaction- what next tree hugging tofu weaver?
Serious point

What is the fun in getting a reaction by simply provoking those you disagree with ?

I am dangerously close [ possibly past the line even] to doing the same tbh

Really what is the point?


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 10:48 am
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Shitty page bumpy glitch appears to be back!


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 10:48 am
Posts: 151
Free Member
 

I am dangerously close [ possibly past the line even] to doing the same tbh

Really what is the point?


You're amusing me. Please carry on.


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 10:50 am
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

What is the fun in getting a reaction by simply provoking those you disagree with ?

Have you ever read a politics thread on here, Junky? 😉

The number of times someone writes something along the lines of, "If it annoys [Group x], then that's great!". Not sure you've ever berated anyone for that.


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 10:52 am
 D0NK
Posts: 10677
Full Member
 

has he got ducktape across his mouth aswell? can't really make out. Piece will obviously be a pisstake just wondering whether clarkson or cyclists will be the butt of the joke. Coz jokes like

a road sweeper going past may and hammond and missing the chance to take a sharp left turn,
aren't really that funny when you consider how often it occurs and how dangerous it actually is.

I think people really do not see that Clarkson has a persona that exists to sell copy
that line gets trotted out all the time, sounding a little tired. He certainly likes to live up to his "persona" and it sells (so does the DM), but the more we hear about him the more it sounds like either it was the real him all along or he's becoming the parody he created.

He can be a funny bloke right enough but I think he seriously believes some of the stuff he's joking about.


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 10:57 am
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

I am not saying i have never done it Cpt [ though denial of the obvious is a STW trait as well 😉 ] and I tend to fight fire with fire [ which is not always wise either to be fair]. However, I was , perhaps rather optimistically, expecting an answer as to what the posters got from doing this. Unfortunately I got 5ths type reply


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 10:58 am
Posts: 1980
Free Member
 

Junkyard. Have a look at what he does for "Help For Heroes". The lack of crowing about this only makes him go up in my estimation.

A great deal of the Top Gear access to the Military is due to this work. Think back on all the the episodes the military are involved. It is not because it appeals to the simple minded Squaddie.


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 11:00 am
Posts: 34535
Full Member
 

meh, the mans obviously a dick his stupid twitter spat has proved that hes actually as bigotted in real life as his 'TV persona'
made all the more depressing by the popularity of the way past its sell by date show, but as pointed out above it does appeal to the simple minded*

this looks like a half arsed effort buy the beeb to try and counter act some of the negative publicity, that as shown in the pic will just result of more pisstaking of cyclists, i suppose we'll just have to take it on the chin, or infact not watch it!

* yeah I know im a condescending-tofu-loving-bbc-guardian-farage-hating-lefty,


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 11:19 am
Posts: 2087
Free Member
 

Honestly can't believe these idiots are still on the TV. I guess it's the mentality of the majority of the population that keep them on there.

It's not even that Clarkson is anti-cycling - they're just not funny or entertaining. It's badly scripted, predicable dribble.


 
Posted : 31/01/2014 11:23 am
Page 1 / 2