I felt he deserved the WC in 2008, as he’d won more races than Hamilton (under the current points system he would have, too) and Hamilton profited from another driver error, rather than winning purely on merit.
Hamilton finished 1st more races than massa in 2008.
It was down to a stewards descision that reversed the number of race wins.
As to the last race – Timo Glock was trying to do what Hamilton and Kimi had done in belgium, take a gamble on slicks in the wet. in Brazil it didnt pay off.
had 2008 been run with a driver on the steward panel (like 2010), Hamilton may well have kept his race win in Belgium, and thus would have had 102 points to Massa’s 95. He was found guilty of breaking a rule the FIA made AFTER the race.
As it was then, you couldnt gain an advantage from cutting a corner. Hamilton let Kimi past after the corner. therefore no advantage gained. a judgement was then given for the next race that you had to wait another corner till you tried to pass again.
keeping the standings as they are from 2008, but given 2010 points system. Hamilton would have had 243points, and Massa would have had 231, making Hamilton’s WC more assured (had he not passed Timo, he would still have been on 241pts, heck he could have crashed out and still won the championship!).