Community

Forum menu
27.5 V 29 hmmmm...
 

[Closed] 27.5 V 29 hmmmm...

Posts: 24438
Full Member
Topic starter
 

27.5 x 2.35 against 29 x 2.25,both Nobby Nic, there's not much in it is there??
[img] [/img]

hmmmm
[img] [/img]

believe the hype ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 4:20 pm
Posts: 24438
Full Member
Topic starter
 

,both [s]Nobby Nic[/s]Schwalbe


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 4:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Do you reckon a narrow enough 29er tyre could make the trails come alive?


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 4:39 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Seriously? Again?


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 4:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Says hans dampf on the tyre, are you on the beers?


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 4:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bit overbiked for the park???


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 4:44 pm
Posts: 1259
Free Member
 

The 27.5 is nearer than the 29, so you have to allow for perspective ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 4:45 pm
Posts: 24438
Full Member
Topic starter
 

nmdbasetherevenge - Member

Says hans dampf on the tyre, are you on the beers?

are you?*

*try reading more than one post ๐Ÿ˜‰

cbmotorsport - Member

Bit overbiked for the park??

not for the tea and cake stop though


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 4:51 pm
Posts: 770
Free Member
 

Its got to be said, my mates norco made more sense when he put the massive Hans dampfs on it. But it didn't make as much difference as that PIC suggests.


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 5:03 pm
Posts: 34474
Full Member
 

My 650b wheels with 2.4 highrollers measure 28.5"


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 5:12 pm
 DT78
Posts: 10066
Free Member
 

Bit overbiked for the park???

*chuckle*

I thought the same ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 5:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The 27.5 is nearer than the 29, so you have to allow for perspective

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 5:24 pm
Posts: 8380
Full Member
 

The 29er is nearly a whole bike length ahead of the 27.5, you wouldn't need a photo finish to sort that one out, it's clearly a lot faster.


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 5:35 pm
Posts: 24438
Full Member
Topic starter
 

DT78 - Member

Bit overbiked for the park???

*chuckle*

I thought the same

most of the rest of the "park" looks like this though
[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 5:36 pm
Posts: 110
Free Member
 

What head angle for the park?


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 5:42 pm
Posts: 34474
Full Member
 

rocketdog only rides park


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 5:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Hitting that tree must have hurt..


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 5:50 pm
Posts: 1617
Free Member
 

the difference in the wheel sizes is more pronounced on the further away shot. Up close seems to be distorting it a bit.


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 5:55 pm
Posts: 24438
Full Member
Topic starter
 

more footy pitch,bowling green, pavillion and pitch n putt riding here


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 6:05 pm
Posts: 110
Free Member
 

^ That does look like a fun park


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 6:12 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Me likee the dark colored looking bike ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 6:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Aww.... we didn't mean it rOcKy


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 6:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 


Hitting that tree must have hurt..

No worries, it just hasn't been photoshopped very well. The second one with the yellow bike (oops!) is a bit better, but the head is way too large for that body (which is Gee Atherton's, I believe).
8)


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 6:15 pm
Posts: 24438
Full Member
Topic starter
 

but the head is way too large for that body (which is Gee Atherton's, I believe)

you have made Ben's day ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 6:18 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

The HD's look a lot fatter then the NN's


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 6:32 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Ahhh but did the trail develop a pulse and start breathing when you got on the 27.5er?


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 6:45 pm
Posts: 8
Free Member
 

asterix - Member

The 27.5 is nearer than the 29, so you have to allow for perspective

[img] [/img]

[b]Funniest post reply EVER......[/b]

RocketDog, just get yourself a Fat Bike and stop worrying, you know you NEED one


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 6:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

650b is aload of tosh , I've owned it and it's rubbish , they should of kept 26inch and 29ers


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 7:14 pm
Posts: 24438
Full Member
Topic starter
 

RocketDog, just get yourself a Fat Bike and stop worrying, you know you NEED one

too mainstream now John


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 7:16 pm
 JCL
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There is definitely not a lot in it when you put a much smaller tyre (don't believe the numbers) on the 29" and place it behind the 650b bike. Funny enough that headtube on the 650b bike looks like it would be too big for the 29" too ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 7:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Lickeys rocketdog?


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 7:55 pm
Posts: 10654
Full Member
 

I recognise that place.

(RD's pic, not the caravan )


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 8:31 pm
Posts: 10498
Free Member
 

Massive tyre closer to the lense appears almost as big as slightly smaller one further away shocker


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 10:21 pm
Posts: 27
Free Member
 

The blue heckler is mine, ridden exclusively 26" until today. All I have to say is that wheel size doesn't matter one bit, but the smile on my face that just won't go away after today's ride does!


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 10:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

All I have to say is that wheel size doesn't matter one bit

Burn the witch.


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 11:55 pm
Posts: 2653
Free Member
 

I have one bike with a 26" 2.4 high roller and another with a 650B 2.1 racing ralph. The difference in circumference for these is also negligible. The only difference I can see at the moment is that the racing ralphs will probably end in a slippery death for me due to the volume of mud around the Kent trails


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 12:37 am
Posts: 2399
Full Member
 

I struggle to see why the same argument (which is inherently flawed) is made again and again. Try putting the same tyre of the same width on a (more or less) identical rim and then make your point.

Say for example a 26, 27.5, and 29 Schwalbe Racing Ralph on ZTR Crests at 30psi - then feel free to spout as much nonsense as you like.

Comparing different tyres on rims with different profiles is just stupid.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 12:57 am
Posts: 11596
Full Member
 

My 26" x 2.35 hans dampf measures 27.25 inches on a stans crest, can i join the 27.5" [i]trail comes alive[/i] debate or does my lack of .25 of an inch mean i'm cast aside with all the other wannabe 26" riding freaks?.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 1:16 am
Posts: 2399
Full Member
 

Also, forgot to mention this, all the tyres should be the same width.

Can we actually get the measurements of a 26, 27.5 and 29 x 2.25 on Crests at 30 psi? Then we can finally put this stupid debate to bed.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 8:20 am
Posts: 10498
Free Member
 

My Bonty TLR 29-4 on a 19mm internal width rim measures 29.5". Can I join the almost Krampus club?


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 8:27 am
Posts: 728
Free Member
 

Different volume tyres in different size shocker?


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 8:28 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well if they are so similar we dont need 650b. There, solved.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 8:47 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm missing something.. A fat tyre on a small wheel is nearly the same as a thin tyre on a big wheel? What about a fat tyre on a big wheel and a thin tyre on a small wheel? Or a fat tyre on both sized wheels, or a thin tyre on both wheels?
Or both wheels with no tyres? Or both tyres with no wheels? Or no tyres and no wheels?
Onandonandonitgoeswhenitstopsnobuggerknows...
This is me vvv
[IMG] [/IMG]
I may be cute, but I'm very sad...


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 10:05 am
Posts: 31035
Full Member
 

I struggle to see why the same argument (which is inherently flawed) is made again and again. Try putting the same tyre of the same width on a (more or less) identical rim and then make your point.

I think the point is... that a change of tyres makes a difference. If you want to go bigger, it might be worth trying a bigger tyre before changing your whole bike.


 
Posted : 19/11/2013 3:27 pm
Posts: 216
Full Member
 

Smaller wheels with bigger tyres are nearly as big as bigger wheels with smaller tyres shock!


 
Posted : 19/11/2013 3:49 pm
Posts: 31035
Full Member
 

Smaller wheels with bigger tyres are nearly as big as bigger wheels with smaller tyres shock!

No surprise at all, but some people need it pointing out to them.


 
Posted : 19/11/2013 3:58 pm
Posts: 2399
Full Member
 

I think the point is... that a change of tyres makes a difference. If you want to go bigger, it might be worth trying a bigger tyre before changing your whole bike.

But a 26*2.4 tyre feels and rolls nothing like a 27.5*2.1. The amount of cushioning, tyre squirm, etc all leads to a very different feel. Not to mention one is a lot wider for the same height!


 
Posted : 19/11/2013 4:45 pm
Posts: 13192
Free Member
 

[img]brimages.bikeboardmedia.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/650B-wheel-size-comparison02.jpg[/img]


 
Posted : 19/11/2013 5:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My 29 HansDampf on a 25mm internal width rim is 30.5"..but as stated previously, no point unless comparing apples with apples, and I'm sure they are all fun on a swoopy dusty trail in the forest on a warm sunny evening ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 20/11/2013 12:48 pm