Blimey!!! Well here is my brain dump on the topic!
What I like is the hit and miss nature of the magazine? I like the randomness of the mag in a way, I also like dirt for the same reasons really. Let me explain sort of…….
Ie MBR MBUK and WMB are quite simlar and if you read the december 08 issue it will have the same info as the 09 07 and I'm sure 2010 issues!
ST however has a huge mix of stuff each month, I dont like the bivving stuff at all, and TBH thought I cant be arsed to read this bit. But I really like the Ferrento, single page artices and the adventure stuff there was a bit a while back on a race in the himalays brilliant, man and boy brilliant jen hopkins brilliant I like the mosley interview. The training stuff is really good I think. The £100 weekend was a good read. and there is lots more as well.
I think its a thankless task some of you love the bivvy bits and hate the bits I like, we cant even agree on whats a good tyre FFS!! How will they Chaps write a mag thats seen as great by all cover to cover each time!!
The pics are good I just like the proper riding in the UK feel of the mag, and the fact is a bit off the mainstream and commerical track in the same way dirt is I see it a a bit more specialist to a more cowabunga MBUK. (I also think its Sh*te that WMB and MBUK share articles thats just poor I know Brant worked for future so no offence mate but you pay nearly a fiver and get the same article twice)
I like the writing style too and I couldnt care about spelling or the grammar its readable and is IMO a thing to be enjoyed not marked like an exam paper!
Either way keep it up chaps!! I'm in for the forseable future!! (apart form the cross bike reviews and bivving thats just tosh :wink:)