Valets credibility is affected in my eyes by his “if he’s not doping he has a motor” line. I can’t see any one ever getting away with that in the Tour.
My thought are Armstrong tore away any kind or credibility the sport or any champions will have in the Grand Tours. He’s used every line, and therefore any rider who says the same will always be tainted. Froome is one of these.
So far he’s clean, no positive tests, I can’t see Sky systematically doping, I can’t see all of the physiologists and British cycling going along with it, or Hoy or Wiggins.
We seem to accept the Ussain Bolt is clean, and just a physiological freak for lack of a better phrase, why can’t Froome be the same.
I too grew up watching Armstrong, as as I read more got to know the sport more I doubted him, and finally didn’t see how it was in any way plausible. Later to see him brought down by Landis, Hamilton, very publicly and Vindicating Emma O Reilly, and Kimmage, Walsh who sowed the seed of my doubts, and if I’m honest I believed off the bat.
I “believe” Froome is clean as I want to believe the sport can be won and competed in clean. Is there a tiny thought that maybe there is a possibility there is a chance he’s not of course, but that’s to do with the history of the sport than Froome himself.