Not strictly in cornwall but close, North morte farm campsite close to Woolacombe has a beach accessible from the site 5 mins downhill (rockham beach) and baricane and woolacombe beaches are not far – great coastal path and area. Pubs and chippy in North Morte and a shop on site.

e: tortelloni with pasta sauce
d: bacchus fruit beer
l: the blinders – columbia lp

The wedding present in April – leeds/June – Keele
DMAs April – Birmingham
The Beths – May – MCR

Scampi n chips in a basket.

try

went to uni here. still going strong.

anyone?

stereolab – cobra and phases group play voltage in the milky night ?

Saw two this morning – one dead on the way back from the gym in a very built up area and the junction of 4 roads, so no real surprise there.

And low and behold during the cycle to work at about 8.20 I witnessed one tootling along a country road right in front of me and then in to a field. It must have missed the last bus!!

I once ran one over…

i don’t have kids and often regret it,…cherish them, your wife lives on through them,..the sun is always shining behind the darkest cloud.

p.s. make sure there is always a toilet roll in the loo,..i’ve just had to do the dreaded spread eagle walk!

All the best.

Keith

The logo needs some work – i’m assuming it’s meant to represent a trail up/down a mountain or is it a camera flash logo? But I’m only led to that by being on here and from what you have said. Otherwise it resembles a christmas tree. It needs to be more obviously a trail – the bottom left should be thicker tailing off up to the top, and moved to more of an angle. And there can be less zig zags.

The logo and name don’t appear to have any correlation to one another? The name reminds me of a bad haircut. Personally I’d dump the name. and come up with something that echoes photography/moment/trail/mtb/cycling etc. That’s not easy, but make it easy to say or memorable.

If you are so keen on showing the photography don’t hide swathes of it behind a logo – putting logo’s on top of images is generally a no no. I would have the image in a panoramic format across the entire breadth of the t-shirt with the logo intersecting in a knocked out circle at the top left corner of it, but it would only be about 50mm radius at most. If you like the logo large I could see more abstract photography (tire tracks in mud) working if you filled the logo with the image, as oppose to what you have done here where they are both fighting for attention with neither winning.

The photography viewpoint idea would be aided by either seeing some bars in the foreground or a rider in the distance. Otherwise i’m not sure people will get it?

p.s. anyone want one of these?

Moon the Loon

Thanks all. I’ve emailed the NYC store. I’ve tried a pdx weight, but it is a different diameter/weight. And fashioning one has crossed my mind, which may ease my pain for a while. It’s been a learning experience for sure.

i’ve just received a cheap 90s walkman of sorts, and am eagerly awaiting The Wedding Present’s Bizarro on tape. I plan on reliving my walk back home after buying it from OurPrice. Excited!

looks ideal and money off?

https://www.rutlandcycling.com/bikes/mountain-bikes/specialized-ruze-expert-6fattie-2017-mountain-bike-grey_318999

only in small though?

triflow lubricating oil

leatherface lodge

great country, loads of potential, lovely people (mostly) hope this new guy can start turning it around.

I like them…

but…they sound like

The Waterboys….

you could camp in scotland near the coast, forage for seafood, hunt game etc, get water from streams/lochs etc.

no need for money.

go for it.

in my experience i feel it’s largely due to maximising profit and minimising hassle.

Scotch whisky can only be labeled ‘Scottish whisky’ if it was produced and matured in Scotland. … Scotch whisky is distilled twice, while Irish whiskey undergoes triple distillation. Scotch whisky uses peat-smoked, wholly malted barley, while Irish whisky used kiln-dried, raw and malted barley.

…one of the best Whiskey/Whisky i’ve ever tasted was irish bushmills 16 yo.

[/quote]Back to your video what is the point for the conspiracy in having an actor give that interview at that time ?

To reinforce the false narrative.

I’m struggling to follow your logic.

So the fact that, according you, they look like secret service, that is because they would be more suspicious if they didn’t look like secret service?

Are they trying to hide or be noticed?

If they were trying the hide, then surely the 2nd “MIB” in the video, who incidentally I agree is probably something to do with the security services, would not of walked in front of the camera and gave such an obviously “no comment” type answer when the reporter spoke to him. Surely if he was trying to hide, why would be acting like he did?

From the words you are using, I guess you are ex-military, my guess you did a couple of years in your local TA. Correct?

i’m really not concerned by what they are wearing,…more interested in their actions and what was said…SS is SS however you dress it…would they be less suspicious wearing a t-shirt and shorts….sure…but they were not.

i had a vision of them all in headquarters in casual attire…sure to raise suspicion amongst cleaners, tea ladies and people from other businesses in the complex…but that is mere play…

could be that the awkwardness displayed by no.2 guy was out of sheer embarrassment…i’m summissing..

…no military background.

How rare is it to fly two jets into the two tallest buildings in the world that are right next to another building ?

rare….but easily doable if two bent out of shape amateur pilots at your local airport made a pact tomorrow they could easily achieve a two plane, two buildings close to another one event…

only rare because its crazy – not rare because it is not easily achievable

3 high rise steel structure buildings collapse mainly due to fire on the same day….very….you get it…

“In the interest of fairness, anyone want to explain the MIBs?” See above but:
Suits in Manhattan ! What next aprons in butcher’s shops!
Every available law/security asset would flood the streets being interested in everything.
Do you seriously think operational spooks wear a clearly identifiable uniform when operational ? Men in Black it’s even in the movies !

….their mannerisms and what they said…rather than what they are wearing more so… if a secret service guy goes to work every day in a suit and then on 9/11 it was mufti day,..that may have been even more suspicious?

anyone remotely sane can believe crap like in that video

feel free to ignore the text overlays…there is probably a version out there without them…

stop with the hate please.

How odd is that to say a burning building that caught fire fell down , structurally failed due to fire .

Very odd, …as it is a very, very, very, very rare occurrence,..and three on one day is pushing it a little.

Are you suggesting that such a carefully planned false flag operation failed at such a basic level?

Are you applying critical thinking?

…it has yet to fail…and likely never will…

the vast majority of humans are used to fake tv….it makes it harder to see the truth IMHO.

Also, if this video is true, “they” have managed to keep another 4 individuals completely quiet about the whole conspiracy

i really don’t buy,…the people would have come forward by now argument, because you know what, they wouldn’t be believed…

I’ve been here since around 2002 ish,..under different names…i was part of billy no mates (people on here came together to form two teams) at sleepless in the saddle at Trentham circa whenever… does that make me a Troll? :-)

In the interest of fairness, anyone want to explain the MIBs?

… i think without the second one saying….errr i can’t tell you why i’m here (off top of my head)… the first one would pass fairly unnoticed…maybe he works for fox, lots of expensive broadcast equipment and reporter to protect?

Media training.

If you’ve had it, you know how to speak to the media in a very assured manner. I know that I do.

Certainly he was ripe for this interview, i agree.

“i am more alarmed by the certainty of his answers “
He saw what happened
“and the guys in black…”
Guys in Manhattan in black suits wow who’d have guessed.
They may be FBI or spooks !if so .. Do you not think the streets would be flooded by random people and every single available security man of every description who would be curious about everything , what with the massive event happening and all ?

he saw what happened from a distance of 5 blocks … but he could not know how exactly the collapse happened…. impossible.

if this was a set up interview….it was set up precisely, with thought,..there is nothing random about this interview…IMHO.

okay…

he used ground zero…. he could have been familiar with the term and used it correctly…

okay…

he worked for fox, he possibly filmed it, saw it all (that could be a lie),
he was deemed a good guy to interview…get it…

i’m struggling with the guys in black and his very assured take on why they came down…

clear these bits up

Ok, look at the video you posted and apply some critical thinking to it.

Critique it from both sides of the debate, not just from what you want to see.

Ignore the text overlay.

i’m learning to do this.

As you say, he wasn’t random. What are the odds that a dude from Fox, finding a witness from Fox, who can speak coherently on TV without saying ****, would use them for that interview?

i agree that could be a sensible move… given the chaos…

i am more alarmed by the certainty of his answers and the guys in black…

amateur hour garbage

proof?

Ok.

The video you posted as amateur hour garbage, and you should be embarrassed about posting it.

you are real good at just ignoring my questions and just jumping on me….i’ve only been nice to you.

…have you got an issue?

The man in a suit in the business end of new York who you find so exciting how do you read his mind ? How do you know why he is interested in listening to the interview , I would imagine the whole point of interviewing people for TV is that random people will be interested.

he wasn’t a random person, he worked freelance for Fox, what are the odds that out of all the people they could have picked to interview it happened to be this guy…

The guy in the suit has an earpiece and shows body language that suggests he is part of this scenario, not just a random suit…

…no wonder i ride alone…

sorry misinterpreted the random person as the interviewed guy… still its unusual…

i don’t mind correcting my wrongs…