I’ve got a 2009 ally model I picked up cheap from the old importer, built up beginning of this year (same as the one in the first MTBR review above). Comments are –
1 – Rear cable routing (through the swing link) is terrible. I bodged something using lots of tape and cable ties and full length outers.
2 – It is a touch on the steep side. I’m using a 150mm fork (instead of 140), smaller back tyre (2.3 front 2.0 rear) and an offset bushing in the shock. Much better now. Rear tyre clearince isn’t great either.
3 – shock valving was wrong (for me), causing the shock to blow through it’s travel unless set with very little sag. This was before I tweaked the geometry as well. A retune to up the compression and boost pressure sorted this tho.
4 – Now it’s sorted it’s bloody great! Light, fast and great fun to ride. Usually gets thrown around welsh / scottish trail centres, Long Mynd, FOD / Monmouth (including local’s only stuff under Staunton) and Bringewood. I loves it.
Hovever, just read this from the MTBR review above 8O
IMPORTANT UPDATE: READ THIS FIRST
We recently discovered that the FTM supplied to us by Titus for this test did not use the production seatstays. The production versions suffered a reportedly high failure rate. Since our test, Titus has gone out of business and a company has purchased their name. This leaves owners of the FTM out on their own. Based on reliable sources, the defect was bad enough that it should have triggered a recall. We would recommend owners of this model to stop riding them. The failure of any seatstay is a serious and dangerous situation.
Had we known the bike had pre-production parts, we would have never tested the bike. Since the bike did use parts that were not available to Titus customers at the time, it makes our test findings totally invalid.
Bugger