This might be more constructive, after all that’s why we've taken the time to contribute to this thread.
Your second post on this thread was, as you put it, fishing – so don't get all high and mighty that you are adding value and I must therefore justify my response to your guff. If it wasn't, your claim of fishing was a late cover up for what was outdated, biased and unqualified guff that did nothing but highlight a solid ignorance of the RAF.
Your point I highlighted and robustly rubbished above was another example of a lack of knowledge on the subject. I doubt you've worked in the Tri-Service environment in this century, so offer only conjecture and historical subjective opinions. The Army has an average reading age of about 14 years old. The RAF has a higher educational requirement for entry into training, on average, than the Army. There are stars and idiots in all Services, but your last statement was unfounded and factuallly incorrect – and not just biased guff.