Not every landowner wants to take on a potential multi million pound liability of peoples shit version of a-line.

It’s abusing the truth that I object to.

And yet you do it so regularly.

Im considering aquiring a set of office slippers for when its too cold for flipflops.

You keep posting stuff that is untrue and it is you that then becomes abusive when this is pointed out

You need to type your query in the box and click search.

I’d of thought you’d of known this after 250 pages of not backing up your statements by telling people they can find the information themselves online.

So it would be great to see any evidence that central bankers are major lenders to banks.

Find things here!

TMH has been very polite to you

Has he ****. He’s continually tried to bait him into the thread like the pathetic little man he is to try and score points to boost his ego and ‘win’ the internet by being obtuse.

All the while hell refuse to engage with anything that doesnt fit his narrative. Much like you jamba.

not our fake version

Meanwhile in the real world….

Do something you enjoy – as its unlikely anyone will care what your A levels are in.

Nothing hinges on her choices apart from maybe a parents pre conceived notions of what their child should do.

Ive had 2 R4s for years always been happy with them. Had one lead go on battery out of warranty – dropped off with them at an event one weekend back to me free of charge with updated strain relief cable wednesday morning.

Turn the barrel adjuster on the remote to make it go faster?

If that doesnt work bleed it using the supplied bleed kit.

Ordered a cone spanner and jacket from wiggle – paid for next day delivery as ill be in. Box turned up with just a cone spanner invoiced for both. Jacket sent via a different courier (myherpes) no idea where it is but it certainly didnt arrive the next day. Not confident im going to see it.

There’s no contradiction.

You can grasp how ‘confidence’ affects the ‘value’ of things in a capitalist economy?

Now have a think about how changing forecasts, and lobbying for clarity on a somewhat tumultuous decision can be used to affect ‘confidence’ and therefore the ‘value’ of things.

My post is quite clear.

The cynic in me would suggest positive pressers from financial management companies have more to do with the bank balances of their (rich) clients than reality of the situation faced by most of the population.

Well that’s good news even tho we a) still haven’t left b) the sum total of SFA relating to the terms of our exit has been agreed.

:roll: (I know you love a smiley)

5 year old me would love being a pirate to be a valid career choice.

Have phone number for work. Get indigent when people use it to contact you about work. :roll:

Dartmoor.

Some people are right shit at geography in here, or assume people still travel by horse in the South West..

Not sure being a tedious **** can really be classed as a hobby.

Thankfully not everybody is prepared to capitulate their beliefs in the face of ill-informed idiocy from 33% of the population.

Handily having the balls to stand up for what you believe in is a fundamental cornerstone of democracy – it’s called opposition – and the responsibility for opposing poor decisions doesn’t stop at MP’s.

As do your shit weasel smiley posts.

If you’re going to question my intellect

Resorting to grammatical errors speaks volumes.

We can take a vote. I vote it did rain.

I’m trying not too because I doubt you’d be able to grasp any of it, but you were happy to post about it when it suited your narrative.

I will however correct the misinformation you posted and provide you with a reason as too why the trails are no longer removed on sight.

I’m acutely aware that it goes on and where it goes on – I ride it all over the country, and I made a few tweaks myself today (sorry more rocks Del!)

My view is that providing people aren’t building dangerous features in inappropriate places and causing grief with other users whats the issue?

It still isn’t. There’s no legal right to go and dig up land you don’t own. The land owner will however weigh up the various risks vs the resources required to remove it / maintain it / monitor them and act from there.

Landowners can give permission for people to build in areas – ie golfie – and are more likely to give that permission if theres a benefit to the local community – which there is in the Tweed Valley – but it will come with conditions.

It’s probably more noticable at BPW due to the frequency of the interactions you have and the close proximity you are in with other users. The demographics in off road cycling have been shifting for the past 7 / 8 years.

I was some what surprised to see the crap that when into it.

Possibly just addressing the continued accusations of fraud. On top of the not knowing how statutory rights work. I think most topics have been visited a few times :lol:

What’s seen as a ethically reprehensible by one may well be seen as an opportunity by another. People are ****.

But there isn’t a difference in liabilities.

Employed ‘Husband’ earning 100k a year with good credit rating.
‘Housewife’ who is unemployed and cannot get finance.
‘Husband’ takes out the finance deal and accepts all liabilities.
If anything goes wrong you pursue ‘Husband’ in court for costs.

Employed ‘Friend #1’ earning 100k a year with good credit rating.
‘Friend #2’ who is unemployed and cannot get finance.
‘Friend #1’ takes out the finance deal and accepts all liabilities.
If anything goes wrong you pursue ‘Friend #1’ in court for costs.

The person signing the contract takes on all the responsibility. Whoever drives it is irrelevant as long as they are correctly insured.

It’s stupid of Friend #1, and you may not ‘like’ it, but there is nothing wrong with it.

So you wouldn’t have a problem if someone was taking out finance on a car their partner would drive?

Hopefully he’d of waited for the 14 day cooling off period before proceeding with any financial outlay; at which point he wouldn’t be out of pocket.

The various legislation’s in place aren’t there by chance. A need has been demonstrated for them to be written into law. From the consumer protection point of view this need has come about through businesses acting unfairly and inappropriately.

I have little sympathy for them if they continue to try and behave in such a manner.

PCP / HP allow you to own the vehicle at the end. PCH does not. That’s the fundamental difference regarding it being a hire vehicle.

Just as an aside, you can’t insure a car and then have someone else drive it full time in my experience.

You are correct. The person using the vehicle most of the time needs to be the main driver on the policy.

However..

You don’t need to own a car to be the main driver on a policy (company cars).
You don’t need to be the registered keeper to insure a car.

Some insurance companies will require you to be the registered keeper, some will just charge you more, some won’t care. But you do have to tell them you don’t own it and aren’t the registered keeper when taking out the policy.

Well worth a punt if you think you have any kind of case and there’s nothing specific that says a car with options is not bespoke.

I’d say this is pretty clear.

14.
An item made up following a consumer order does not necessarily make it a bespoke item which is exempt from cancellation rights. An item, for example a sofa or computer, can be assembled following an order but the component parts may be made up of parts offered from a standard range. So, for instance, a sofa where the consumer chooses a fabric and colour from a range on offer will not be bespoke for the purposes of these Regulations.
However, if the consumer asks the trader to source a special finish and which is not in the range generally offered by the trader, that is likely to be a bespoke item.

Also the OP said it was from a pre-specified list of cars / specs so likely to be pre-built and in storage; if this is the case – not ‘bespoke’.

Wrong. You can’t misrepresent like that to a finance company.

What you call misrepresentation some of us see as ineptitude and incompetence.

Potentially, it’s defrauding the finance company

Provided the person requesting the finance gives his details there’s no fraud.

He is accepting the liability for the hire and vehicle once provided. Who drive the car is irrelevant to you provided they are properly insured.

So if his friend didn’t pay him; he would be the person you reclaim costs from.

As I said it’s not illegal it is stupid on his part.

Hmm new forum game Ling fishing..

(fishling maybe?)

What stuff didn’t they disclose?

You can buy a car for some one it’s not illegal. Stupid maybe.