Landowners have a duty to maintain their gates so that they are operable. If I find a gate that doesn’t have a working latch or at least a loop of rope that can be used to secure it and which doesn’t swing freely on it’s hinges it gets reported to the HA. If it still isn’t fixed next time I use it it doesn’t get closed.
There was one on the Pennine Bridleway near Earby that only had 1 hinge, didn’t clear the ground beneath it and the rope required you to lift the gate 8 inches to get it over the post. It got left open a few times after reporting it and hey presto nice shiny new gate with a working latch that opens freely.
I don’t understand how a HA or NP can spend money on resurfacing to improve access when most of the gates on a ROW will present more of an obstruction than the surface.
Lack of signage and poor access controls are the biggest limitation to access across the network for all users if you experience a poor gate report it it doesn’t cost the HA anything it’s the landowners responsibility to maintain their stock controls. (unless the HA installed it to restrict vehicular access.)
I’d personally prefer it if HA’s had the power to remove poor access controls if not repaired within 6 weeks of serving notice on the landowner.