We've had a glimpse of another big problem with PR in the past couple of days – no one really knows what's happening. The horse-trading, behind closed doors meetings are opaque to the public and would be an endless feature of any PR set-up.
Surely this is just a failure of expectations. These are important decisions that should be allowed to take some time. The 'horse trading behind closed doors' is horseshit – it's not like the party manifestos are created in the open (er, i could be wrong there). If out of this comes a Lib/Con alliance that curbs the excesses of both parties manifestos – eg
– brings in the Libdem's starting rate of tax
– tempers the worst Tory extremism on Europe
– leads to a reassessment of Trident
isn't that a good thing? There's talk that there would be a joint, published document (effectively a joint manifesto). I don't really care that it was thrashed out in private rather than public.
Re PR surely the principle should be to empower the voter – no matter where you are your vote should make a difference. Constituency issues can be sorted (a larger constituency with >1 MP would mean you were more likely to get representation, if slightly less local, from someone closer to your beliefs) and a top up central list (again i can't quite see the issue – very few people are actually involved in the selection of their local MP and these top up MPs wouldn't be representing local issues.). It might be a good idea to have some MPs who were not, as in my case, worrying about "continuity of Ice Rink provision in Streatham" or the "constituency office wall" as in Thick of It.
If the price for this is a few BNP MPs who get ignored by everyone (and based on the Council seats they gained, probably won't even bother to turn up) then so be it.