The whole jobs v scenery question affects all the countryside, but is more acute in National Parks.
It’s very well protecting the landscape, although that same landscape has often been shaped by human activity in the first place, but there is a human cost to it.
If you favour scenery over jobs then you end up forcing out the young locals and replacing them with holiday homes and retired people, who want the scenery not the jobs.
Just think of dry stone walls; if you went to the National Parks people today with a proposal to build miles and miles of walls up and down the hilsides to develop it as a sheep rearing area you’ld probably be sent packing sharpish, yet those stone walls are part of the scenery that people value so highly.
And I think that equating a desire to keep the local economy going, or “just because you want to save a few jobs” as you put it, with racism is a bit over the top.