coffeeking – Member
kimbers, I’m 27 and very definitely not “old fashioned”.
Blimey; I hope you mellow out a bit by the time you get to my age, mate (37 and still childish and irresponsible)!
To my mind expanses of concrete, blank rendered walls and corporate colour schemes and logos detract from the environment.
I agree. A blank wall is a blank space, like a blank canvass is. It is not natural, or within our Humanity, to be surrounded by blank spaces. It is praps almost instinctive, to want to fill in a blank space.
Of course, this needs to be done with sensitivity and consideration. Unfortunately, this is virtually impossible to achieve, as it would need someone to oversee operations; this would undoubtedly introduce individual agendae, and therefore be constrictive. And you can’t just say ‘oh, it’s ok to graffiti a boring motorway support, or a warehouse wall’. Because not all motorway supports/walls would be in locations where graffiti is appropriate.
I do object to the amount of public space that is festooned with advertising hoardings. I don’t believe the vast majority of adverts add anything to the aesthetic appeal of places. In fact, many are just downright offensive; ‘Buy, Consume, Spend’. Obscene. But I have little say over this. Because it is allowed by Law, public spaces are fair game.
Why not have billboards that artists can fill with material of their choice? I know there’s an element of ‘control’, with this, and not all would want to participate, but it would act as a showcase for individual talent and expression.
Question: What is socially more damaging; a bit of graffiti on a railway siding, or an advert objectifying female sexuality, reinforcing ideals and stereotypes?