Just look at the current low number of +tests
Microdosing, smaller blood bags, training camps in remote locations…
Surely he must have been clean when he came 3rd in the 2010 tour? Testing must have been so advanced then
No way. Why would he have changed the habit of a lifetime? Plus, Mike Ashenden is convinced his blood data shows clear signs of manipulation (less than one in a million chance of it NOT being, according to him).
if they all took drugs aleast you would know they are all on the same page
But Armstrong was paying Ferrari more than most cyclists are even paid. It’s not a level playing field even if everyone is cheating, because some people respond better to the drugs, and importantly – some people can afford a much more comprehensive programme.
What does it all mean to me? I ADORE the sport, and I desparately want it to clean up. I walked away from it for a few years after the Hamilton and Tyler busts, creeping back with some trepidation in the last few years as more and more stuff was exposed. Now we’re at a turning point… either the current regime crumbles, and things radically change, or the fat old men running the UCI somehow hang on and we end up with a sport in freefall, gradually turning into something sub-pro-wrestling.
Either way, I’ll still be there by the roadside. Hell, I love watching it. But I’ll be SO much happier if I can start to believe it again. Right now, I don’t believe in it, and that includes Sky’s miraculous performance this year.