“Orange crush I think that you may be letting prejudice taint your comprehension of what you are reading. That para of the land reform act does not make it illegal to have a dog on a trail centre at all and a dog under control can go anywhere.”
I did not say it was illegal to have a dog “on a trail centre”, please read what I said more carefully.
I have no prejudice – merely stating the rules as I read them. Dog must be under proper control, generally held to be close control – normally meaning on a lead.
Access rights are not exercisable on land “set out for a particular recreational purpose” which sounds like a pretty good description of a trail centre route to me. This would also apply to the happy hikers who insist on walking on the Glentress bike trails instead of on the dedicated walking trails there (which the rule equally prevents people using whilst cycling).
The overarching principle is responsible use and, in the context of the above, I would suggest that if a dog caused injury on a dedicated bike route there would prima facae be failure to achieve the required level of responsible use.