Not wanting to be too graphic, I was ‘hovering’ while trying to go into a container before decanting the contents of same into a tube with the little plastic spoon provided.
This latest ‘agreement’ encapsulates the issue. We (the Westminster parties) have decided between ourselves and without consulting you what limited responsibilities – but not necessarily the funding – we shall grant you when, as we expect, you vote No.
I see there’s been a symbolic devo-max agreement signing. Is this the same agreement as was signed last week? The No campaign appear increasingly desperate.
I doubt if a rebrand as a franchise is possible. There are two EE stores in my small town, hangovers from when Orange and T-mobile were seperate entities. Once the leases expire in similar circumstances there will no doubt be further contraction from the high street to online.
Yes I’m aware of such incidents in the TdF; often caused by errant children. And further along the road someone decided it would be a really good idea to bring along an excitable dog. At least they kept it on a lead.
Pull tag out with swiss army knife tweezers then snip with scissors. The tweezers are also good at removing pesky ingrowing whiskers or ear and nasal hair.
It is just one example of the malaise of institutional bias the Beeb suffers from. If the vote is a narrow one this sort of evidence will be cited qs cause for legitimate grievance. It won’t be over next Friday, whatever happens…
It sounds like an excuse to me. No doubt prices would also be raised south of the border and ‘market volatility’ caused by an iS would be blamed for that as well.
If you believe Lie News, parliament may be recalled for an emergency debate in the event of a Yes vote. I wonder what they might do? Pass emergency legislation? Disolve itself and hold a snap general election? Or just waffle in shock?