No, but what about her right to privacy? As everyone else?
I do agree that she has a right to privacy and this appears to have been breached but that angle is not going to sell papers: that would seem to me to be fairly obvious to most I’d assume. Its the public appetite for stories of schadenfreude. What point are you arguing here?
Did you know; every filthy, dirty, smutty, pervy little site you look at, is recorded by your IP. you wanna be worried about the dodgy ‘schoolgirl doggy style’ vids that you lot look at…..
Why? Even if somebody did watch them, who cares as long as there not charged to somebody’s employer and illegal.
If she’s a ****, fair enough.
Eh?