“A very large portion of the Harvey Weinstein claims are precisely this but that doesn’t stop us from treating them seriously so why would you not do the same in this instance?“
Hmm, well the allegations in the HW shitstorm seem to be quite considerably more graphic than “I was asked a question and I said no”
No mention of naked massages or rape for instance..
I’m not doubting the sincerity of his claim, and if Sir Tom was a victim then that’s a tragedy- regardless of how severe the conduct in question, BUT there’s a difference between “a question” and people coming out and stating they were raped.
And I agree with the above comment regarding the perpetrator- oddly my interpretation of his spoken comments were that it was a man who propositioned him. Not sure why I thought that but there you go.