owned a nomad (1st gen), demo’d a nomad 2 for 2 days and have demo’d a 160 for 3 days. i too am torn between frames to replace the ageing nomad – i would comment
nomad –
supple vpp feel
unpredictable vpp feel (never absolutely know what it is going to feel like) blows through mid travel a bit (better that the old one)
quiet
bearings (must be better than the old one which costs a fortune in money and missed weekends to replace the bearings) Apparently the new ones need to be regularly greased or the bearings die quite quickly.
QR – the QR constantly releases itself on my nomad 1 (which may be my fault for not tightening it enough but after 5 years the metal is getting a bit deformed down there).
alpine 160
suspension – a bit ‘chattery’ compared with the buttery nomad, but will come down to set up and may be better with a ccdb (although i am a bit convinced the nomad 1 is super supple because of the mid stroke softness, which is great for the rough stuff but rubbish for getting any support of the face of jumps, kickers etc) So i would say the 160 is 90% as good as the nomad, with 10% of some aspects better.
noise – a bit noisy (who cares)
maxle – love it
bearings – its just not going to be an issue
price – frame with ccdb for price of nomad….
personally i am still to decide, but am also interested in a tough spec 5 – because of the lightness (both the nomad and 160 are a fair old slog to get to the good bits) or a blood, which i have demoed for a couple of days and absolutely loved (like a sparky short travel slack and lairy nomad) but the lack of all round use puts me off slightly.