ok, i like this idea. i’m no downhiller (not anymore, leastways), more into longer XC stuff, but i like the sound of this. to start – i’ve never paid for uplift in scotland, but the one i would like to try out is fort bill – not keen on £32 to ride in a coach with a suicidal driver for only 8 runs. but chairlift/tow seems better, as there’s no need to wait for the coach/tractor to be full.
also, i know there some big differences, but i loved riding around morzine using the lifts. the last time i went i was pretty XC but had trouble convincing myself to ride up!
anyway, here’s a list of things that occur to me:
1- i think there could well be an issue with the NIMBYs – there was hotel complex proposed there a year or two ago and it never got the go ahead, despite the likelihood that it’d be built right infront of that artificial white streak that is the ski slope.
2- jimmy mentioned sheffield ski slope, and i seem to recall seeing a video from a few months ago of steve peat riding a dh trail was served by the tow – so this should probably be looked into.
3- the problem of subsidy that bajsyckel mentioned is valid – IIRC the slope was nearly closed about a year ago as midlothian/edinbuirgh council wanted to pull funding.
4- it definitely needs input from bonaly builders, as druidh says
5- innerleithen – how much work goes into those DH tracks? i rode an XC time-trial a couple of years ago there and some of the trails were brand new without any prep being done – just tape marking the route. seems that some of these tracks are still used. would building a track with minimal ‘foundation’ work and holding a race be feasible? this may bring in lots of interest and therefore money which can then be used as justification of building more ‘solid’ tracks.
6- CONVERSELY!! there’re people new to the sport who may like a solid, trainer track, that gives thrills without all the hard work of toiling uphill. i suspect my girlfriend might appreciate a venue where she could hone her skills without have to be pretty ‘bike-fit’ from the get-go.
7- pentland hills regional park is one step down from national parks – and has a remit to promote leisure pursuits while ensuring it is still a ‘working’ landscape. can this fit proposal with that? or does hillend’s status as a country park trump this?
phew, that’s it from me! i’d love to be able to help more with this – just ask if you need.