I can’t help but think that planning departments have been making money off planning applications for extensions that would have been allowed under permitted development anyway and not advising this is the case.
*So it only really appears to be an (ahem) extension of these existing rights.
More of a concern generally is that in alot of cases developers of sites usually have to give a proportion over to affordable housing – the new guidance I heard was that this would no longer be required if it wasn’t economically viable.
Can’t help but think that not many affordable based of developers calcs that the figures don’t stack up!
* I haven’t actually seen what the proposals are fully.