Morning!*
I read a paper, well a couple actually. The best sounding one was unavailable on t’wifes uni access. :-(
A summary of the more relevant ones;
1) All Dressed up with Something to Say: Effects of Typeface Semantic Associations on Brand Perceptions and Consumer Memory
Author(s): Terry L. Childers and Jeffrey Jass
Source: Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 12, No. 2 (2002), pp. 93-106
Sample size 96 undergraduates.
Research from information design and marketing has demonstrated that individuals are capable of perceiving consistent meaning in typefaces… (Bartram, 1982; Rowe 1982; Tantillo, Lorenzo-Aiss, + Mathisen, 1995; Walker Smith, + Livingston, 1986)
General Discussion and Conclusions
Taken together, the results of the two experiments provide evidence that typefaces convey meanings that have the potential to significantly influence important marketing constructs.
Semantic associations may be activated via one of three paths to meaning, or some combination of these three paths, including (a) through consistent use in a particular situation, (b) through a direct relations with the perceptual qualities generated by the visual patterning of the stimulus, and/or (c) via associations with abstract connotative dimensions
In a marketing context, for example, a typeface that is used consistently to represent a brand name may acquire a number of diverse semantic associations which become centered on the meaning of the brand
2) Quantifying Perceived Differences in Type Styles: An Exploratory Study
Author(s): John Tantillo, Janet Di Lorenzo-Aiss and Richard E. Mathisen
Source: Psychology + Marketing, Vol. 12, No. 5 (1995) pp. 447-457
Sample size – 250. Subjects, undergraduate and graduate students. 56% female, 44% male, average age 24.4 years.
The study found that [subjects] perceived affective differences among the six most frequently used type styles and among the serif and sans serif taxonomy. Thus from the point of view of advertising practitioners, differences in type-style selection are important
Care to produce any counter evidence TandemJeremy :wink:
*It’s 9am here ;-)