Some good reading in this thread. Interesting link to pinkbike thoughts about the design and development challenges associated with larger wheels. So what I’m thunking is;
26″ bikes have a shorter ‘maximum rider height’ than 29″ bikes. The inverse being true at the short arse end of the spectrum.
29″ wheels aren’t strong enough to handle the gnarr that the bike geometry they encourage(slack, longer wheelbase) likes, combined with the weight of the larger rider.
29″ bike with no bb drop is an inherently better place to start designing a bike.
I’m going to be paying more for whatever fork I buy from now on due to the vast array of options being offered to the market. 8O How long can that really continue before industry standards dictate a more consolidated selection? The margins must be soo much smaller on each unit due to higher tooling costs and lower sales.
Ski and snowboard industry analogies work to a point. Sidecut, no sidecut, reverse sidecut, positive camber, negative camber, early rise, magnatraction edge blablabla. Main manufacturers shifted their whole range to no camber boards for a season and then reverted, worked as a pr stunt. Now its settled down and there is an available ski/board that is best suited to any particular style of riding.