the bike press in the US have been writing a lot of good things about the Ripmo and Enduro mag gave it a good write up. https://enduro-mtb.com/en/ibis-ripmo-af-coil-2020-review/ but they rated the Nukeproof best in their 9 bike testing.
Not knowing how the bike industry works, I’m always a bit sceptical of these multi-bike tests. How do the press outlets select the ‘x’ number of bikes that they test? Do they contact all manufactures and it’s only the ones that provide test bikes? Is it only new models for that year? What about the brands that dont send their models or tested? Are they then viewed as inferior because their not in the headlines?
Ibis have done a good job of getting their bike out there to the press and increasing it’s presence by ‘issuing’ them to youtubers and no doubt it’s a great bike but there’s a lot of bikes out there eg Giant, Bird, Nukeproof, Vitus, Norco, Orbea, Specialized, Santa Cruz, GT, Canyon etc that would fit your needs. In lieu of not being able to ride them, get the one that you like the look of the most 🙂
I think we’re at a time where we’re spoiled for choice with a fantastic range of bikes from 120mm going up in increments of 5mm to 170mm that would fit your bill. Do we have too much choice in that whatever you pick are you going to read the next review or wish you had 5mm more or less?