Oliwb… On page 2 I asked a question why a scheme of extended provision would not work, but a bit like what they did with child allowance….you automatically get free meals but if you earn over x amount (or if you would rather your kids take a packed lunch for that matter) you opt out of the free meals.
Someone posted the report that (if my memory serves me correctly) said the extended provision (an opt in scheme) did not work because of the stigma and parents not knowing about it. So if it was an opt out thing, that would remove the parents not knowing about it thing and if the stigma issue can be ‘managed’ out by paying at a reception (or something similar).
Does it all come down to the cost of implementing the scheme? And the free for all is actually cheaper to implement