Some interesting points made here but the people turning this into a political debate of any kind are ridiculous. Sadly the media and thus politicians seem to be following suit and we will all end up worse off be it through diverted investment in other services, higher taxes or higher insurance premiums.
You would probably have to change 300 years of history to address current and future flooding issues.
– Forest clearing for agriculture
– Decrease in green spaces everywhere
– Building on flood plains
– Slow adoption of SUDS and grey water recycling in new developments
– Planning
– Constant urge for more affordable houses (at any cost)
– Under investment / poor investment in flood infrastructure
– Climate change (and all associated causes!)
But by far the biggest is the sheer amount of rain. Something which could happen in any year.
The suggestion that other countries cope with bigger rainfall is mis-direction. Land forms naturally to cope with the local climate so wetter countries will cope with wetter weather.
I’d be interested to know which of these western countries build flood infrastructure to cope with 1 in 250 year events!? I don’t expect many, if any.