1 Chelsea £558,190,000 £191,875,000 £366,315,000 £20,350,833
2 Manchester City £403,110,000 £102,553,000 £300,557,000 £16,697,611
3 Liverpool £416,855,000 £216,120,000 £200,735,000 £11,151,944
6 Manchester United £415,350,000 £276,065,000 £139,285,000 £7,738,056
First Column purchased, 2nd Sold, 3rd Net Spend and 4th per season spend? Now correct me if I'm wrong buy 3 multiplied by 7.7 is not 11.14. Man Utds figures are massaged a wee bit by Ronaldo's £80m transfer too.
No these ones, the ones when Benitez was the boss of Liverpool
1 Manchester City £299,750,000 £71,900,000 £227,850,000 £37,975,000
2 Chelsea £267,950,000 £123,300,000 £144,650,000 £24,108,333
3 Liverpool £249,230,000 £140,480,000 £108,750,000 £18,125,000
4 Tottenham £259,000,000 £162,250,000 £96,750,000 £16,125,000
5 Aston Villa £130,200,000 £40,255,000 £89,945,000 £14,990,833
6 Sunderland £105,080,000 £30,400,000 £74,680,000 £12,446,667
7 Manchester United £193,650,000 £161,550,000 £32,100,000 £5,350,000
And as for the Ronaldo deal that doesn't massage anything because that is what they sold him for. Liverpools stats look better because they got 30 million for a midfielder that Bentiz was trying to flog for 12 the year before. The only way that figure could be skewed is if United didn't get that 80 million which they did.
That is like saying that Liverpool's figures are massaged down because Benitez fluttered 95 million on the signings of:
Morientes
Bable
Dossena
Riera
Keane
Pennant
Aquilani
and Glen Johnson
none of whom have really shook the earth in the Kop.