Although year on year participation is growing rapidly it is still a minority sport and therefore much of the public don’t really understand what it’s about. That means the public generalize based on stereotypes or what little experience people have of the people who partake in the sport. One bad experience with some prat and the pereception is that everyone who does it is a prat.
I’m not entirely sure if I’m talking about biking or shooting. I do both and there are some similarities with how other people perceive both sports.
To say shooting/hunting is barbaric I think is a bit strong, to also say that shooters destroy habitat is also a bit off mark. I mainly go clay shooting but have been pigeon shooting a few times. I know that if I kill a bird I’ll be eating it later. I’ve never done pheasant shooting and I’m not sure if I fancy it but each to their own (although I do like pheasant). If you eat meat you should accept where it comes from and the methods used to despatch it quickly and as humainly as possible.
With regards to habit etc shooters do a lot of management of the countryside in the same way as farmers, gamekeepers and estate managers. Without the management the countryside will turn into wilderness and not have the diversity of species which we have had for hundreds of years.
I’m a member of the BASC – British association of shooting and conservation, It’s the biggest association for shooting in britain and they have conservation in the title so it must be pretty important to them too.
Have a look at the website http://www.basc.org.uk/ and see what shooting is about.
After a week of been stuck in an office with crap lighting my weekend has to include a day in the countryside whether it’s biking or shooting.