My main problem with MM’s scientific studies is that they are invariably based on small population sizes, the people in the program, and the trials are rarely controlled or blinded.I think he is often following previous, well designed scientific trials, but the TV programs are very much designed for tv consumption.I’ve always found Michael Kendrick more thorough and useful.
I’m a Pathologist with 42 years of working in the NHS and have seen many examples of poor, inconclusive science, manipulated by big Pharma and other commercial interests which have then gone on to be publicised in the daily press and seen as the “next big thing” in health care.