Out of interest if she had said nothing at all and refused to answer any questions would you interpret that as
1) Proof she was innocent
2) suspicious
3) I probably wouldn’t have interpreted it as anything.
I wasn’t aware that she was being implicated until she produced a 1700 word press release saying that she’s innocent.
Then saying ‘I don’t really care what committee thinks’, when clearly she does.
If there’s three abnormal readings that can be explained away quite reasonably, then get an expert to publish their explanation, don’t just say I could, but I don’t have to because I’m innocent. Put up or shut up.
It would never of crossed my mind that she doped before that press release, but she appears to be digging a massive hole for herself imo.