I guided a group on the ‘challenge’ last year just because I was curious as to how the event was ran and about the type of people doing it. What did I glean from the ordeal (and it was an ordeal!)?
1) I felt I was in the van more than walking – indeed I was.
2) The people who were undertaking the challenge were genuinely trying something hard for them to raise money for a good cause.
3) the company I was working for briefed all members about the problems surrounding the ‘challenge’ so they were fully aware of their impact.
4) the itenary was such that there were no excessivly early departures through private properties causing disruption.
5) I won’t be doing it again!
Unfortunately point 3 isn’t always done by other companies. Many individual fundraisers, not using a third party company, do not do any research into the ‘challenge’ and tend to cause more damage than they raise in sponsorship through erosion, pollution and noise etc.
Have fun either way but thought I would put a bit of an input into the debate. I don’t like the event, but I realise it does raise money for charities which is no bad thing and it provides an income to some people, like myself. There are better events to partake in and would love to see the end to the N3P.