Bike rumour have nailed it, they said “As further evidence that Surly live in a parallel universe in which suspension never evolved to its current (really quite good) state, aluminum is suitable only for containing beer, hydraulic disc brakes are something to be viewed with suspicion, and neither skis nor snowshoes were ever invented, we have the Krampus. A steel frame…”
is Surly some sort of cult? many Surly Fanbois seem to have truely lost the plot to the stage of stalking Surlys next project and wanting it before even knowing what it will be. 😕
Seeing as the word “better” seems popular, are Aluminium and Carbon not far “better” materials for an overly heavy bike you’re going to use on beaches and salted roads in winter?
Tyres are suspension. The original tuneable cheap light suspension.
only thing is..”suspension” has moved on since that classic steel suspension atb the Raleigh activator..
Ride a fat bike and you will understand. It’s an extreme example, but big tyres feel good.
I have, and probably understand how bicycle tyres behave better than many of the fatbike owners I know but for me, personally they do not feel good anywhere other than over sand/bogs at slow(ish) speeds and for any riding involving acceleration, faster directional changes or rough/technical ground at speed they handle awfully. IMHO short travel high quality damped suspension would be a welcome addition to aid control for a bicycle with massive, terrible handling low pressure tyres if you ever want to ride them anywhere other than smooth surfaces at speed but that simply would not fit the image their Cult promotes as much as a sprung leather saddle or a frame mounted hip flask – image over function? 😉