Interesting few phrases you use “avoidance” ? we are informed by our supplier of the possibility of a TRIAD so react accordingly as it cost our firm £600,000 a few years back for 1/2 hour we ignored.
I understood it to be us helping out NG on not overloading the grid or we got shafted but your implication is its just a pure money grab?
There has been at least 1 TRIAD peak this year at 7pm which is past what I would consider usual commute time, I get that a huge swathe of the population works 9-5 so can cope with middle of the night charging
Avoidance is the correct term but it’s in no way dodgy as in tax avoidance, any energy manager worth his salt will be undertaking triad avoidance and the financial benefit is large versus the effort. It isn’t really doing the grid any favours though, the charge is there to discourage usage at that time and fund investment in the infrastructure required to deliver maximum demand, so avoidance leads to underfunding national Grid if you only cut load on triad days and it isn’t representative of your peak load at peak time. This is why they are reviewing the charging mechanism and currently in court fighting to get triad export revenue removed. From next year it looks like you won’t be allowed to use diesel generators for TRIAD avoidance, so that will force industry to adapt to better cutting load or boost grids income.
That 7pm triad call was a pain to say the least but will no doubt be more common in the future