Hello hello hello….
The reason they all look similar externally is because the costs of a mould like that is several tens of thousands, so chinese factories share the moulds, sell them on when they’re worn and reverse-engineer other moulds from existing products to save the trouble of designing a mould shape that works.
What I am getting-at is: It’s not a great surprise when something you buy that is of very low price turns-out to have been made exclusively down to that price, by cutting as many corners as possible.
Quality is defined as “Meeting customers requirements” by J.S.Oakland*; and the form this takes varies depending on the market, market segment, and also the industry.
“Quality” in a hospital, is different from “Quality” in a restaurant, “Quality” in a £38 light is different from “Quality” in a £300 one.
Here the examples include: features [output, run-time] @ the price-point. However, unless there’s some crazy market being exploited [Lupine..?] then the £300 light is going to be made with more-expensive components, more expensive labour, more of these components and also, better quality-management practices, and so therefore the reliability, longevity and [importantly] the safety of the electronics [incorporating over-rated components, heat-stable ones and number of fail-safe features] which is not visible to the eye will all have to be reduced in cost to the supplier to continue the normal percentage markup.
With these sort of gadgets, we’re usually looking at manufacturing cost being approximately 15% of the retail price, but to be kind here lets say 20% – so the SStorm light was made for about £7.60 or likely less.
So – for £7.60 you might get a lot of lumens, but you won’t get a safe charger.
I guess that’s what I meant, but due to the remains of a hangover I didn’t feel like typing that at midnight-ish.
I am quite tempted to buy one though 🙂
*Linky