“For the offence of rape to have been committed the defendant must have penetrated you without your consent, or continued to penetrate you after you withdrew your consent, and the defendant must not have reasonably believed that you were consenting.” Definition of rape from Sexual Offences Act.
See – if Assange reasonably believed that they had given their consent, which it MAY have been reasonable to assume, then it wasn’t rape from a legal perspective in the UK. Swedish laws may differ.
It’s an interesting one right enough.
My standpoint is that Assange is being stitched up AND that he’s a creepy assed mofo who needs a slap for what he may have done to those women – rape or no rape.