What makes the Five so special is the fact that it simply does exactly what you ask of it. Nothing more, nothing less. It doesn’t try to do anything for you or compensate for the terrain below you. You make inputs and it responds immediately and predictably.
The rest is up to you! It’s why people like Rowan Sorrell are so devastatingly quick on them!
And you can spin it’s weak points however you want.
You can argue the chain growth on a Five is like “Brain” technology, only smarter – it literally only firms the shock up when you’re pedalling – firm under power, open and active when you’re freewheeling.
Inactive under braking – true, true, but it does squat which means BB gets lower, angles slacker and it actually sets you up for the corner better. Also, Steve Peat seemed ot get round it by just staying off the brakes.
Poor square edge hit performance – hitting a square edge is still slow even if the bike deals with it well.
But for some balance…
It used to be bench-mark stiff but the swingarm is feeling a little flexy these days.
I also agree that the 07/08 geo was the sweet spot – the newer slacker ones are loosing their versatility IMO. What’s made the Five so great in the past is the fact that it was as an effective long travel xc bike (Paul Murrin even won Mountain Mayhem on a Five I believe) as it was a gravity sledge. I feel the latest ones have gone too far to the gravity end.