Speed is just a single metric with which people judge how good a driver you are.
If I drive down the A1, on a clear day, paying good attention at 85mph when there’s little to no traffic and I keep good distance to other vehicles am I worse driver than someone going 29 in a 30 limit whilst tired, paying little attention and thinking about what they’ll cook for tea?
We can’t measure attentiveness with a camera on the side of the road. So we measure speed.
People get caught by a camera that makes no judgement on HOW they’re driving, just how fast.
As I said earlier – I got nabbed doing 46 in a 40 limit. It was a dual carriageway and I was pretty much the only vehicle on the road. It was dry, daylight and out of rush hour. And there are no pathways or houses anywhere near it.
The van was on an overpass and was not clearly visible to me.
I agree totally that the faster you go the nastier an accident will be. But what was I going to hit? Thin air.
This is the problem. It is possible to drive fast and safe. But if you think like a speed camera you won’t ever differentiate between sticking to a limit and being safe whatever your speed.
My ex-wife would NEVER exceed the speed limit. But she was an appalling driver. Almost no-one in her family would get in a car with her, and I hated it when she drove.