Good article.
IMV this appears to be very much ‘more of the same’, though an actual national policy is welcome this she’s seem to reflect what’s been happening in our area for about the past 15 years.
The majority of people who when asked what they’ve been doing might respond ‘mountain biking’ are usually riding lower grade trails. You’re not riding advanced stuff straight off the bat, some people will never progress that far and that’s the reason off piste stuff can exist. It doesn’t need to be built to the same standards in terms of surfacing as the official stuff does because it doesn’t get the same level of use.
Chris’ point above illustrates the importance of relationships. If the individuals on the ground are open to it then getting to know them and building trust can accomplish an awful lot more than people might think. It opens up opportunities for things like borrowing enough rakes and mattocs for 5 of you to restore a damaged bit of trail in a few hours on a Saturday morning, or for a few trailer’s worth of 45 to dust appearing just where it’s needed.
As an organisation I understand why the forestry wants to deal with sanctioned volunteer groups but a few committed individuals can make a massive difference to a riding spot, and have been doing so for years.
Mountain bikers don’t seem to lend themselves to getting organised much beyond turning up for a race for some reason. I don’t think this is a bug, it’s a feature.