I currently use triple STIs on a double. I simply limited the front mech, using the limiting screws. To run a triple as a double you can remove the third ring. Limit the front mech and it will work. It will look better if you replace long cage rear mech with a short one and shorten the chain accordingly. Mine is a nine speed set up. Not sure if it works on ten speed.

I am 6’3″ with a 36″ inside leg. I have a Crossrip Elite 56cm. I based my sizing on top-tube length. I have always found that if you get the correct top-tube length then all else falls into place. Leg length accommodated by the seatpost. I must say that I am really impressed by my Crossrip. Definitely biased towards the category of commuter or tourer, rather than fast CX bike. Decent spec and robust wheels. Very comfortable. Actual prefer riding it over my Giant TCR. I have a rack and guards fitted. Only criticism is the handlebars are enormous!

Leatherman UK gives brilliant customer service. Recently lost a screwbit for my skeletool. Contacted them and asked about buying a replacement. They simply sent me one FOC by return post. Certainly won my future custom.

John Hurt, what’s the prize?

Drambuie is rather pleasant in a hip flask. Nicely warming.

I would view this differently. Initially the money arrived in the recipients account by mistake. There is no dishonesty at this point. However if it can be proven that the recipient has been informed that this money has arrived in his account in error and is the property of the sender and yet he still decides to keep it then he is certainly appropriating it and it could easily be argued that this is a dishonest act. Whether he spends it or not is surely irrelevant.

At the point where the receiving party is informed that the money is not theirs(ie property belonging to another), sent in error, and they decide to keep it. They have appropriated it (assumed ownership) with the intention of permanently depriving you of the money. This matches the legal definition of theft. Try your local constabulary.