Legislating to overturn a load of convictions en masse is probably the one way to sort out this horrific situation, and I certainly can’t think of any better solution. But it’s also going to set a worrying precedent from a constitutional perspective. After all, if parliament can legislate to say that somebody found guilty by a criminal court was in fact not guilty, then why can’t parliament legislate to find that someone found not guilty by a court was, in fact, guilty…?
When you combine that thought with the way that this government has systematically sought to criminalise the act of peaceful protest and has very publicly undermined the decisions of juries that have decided to acquit, there has to be a risk that all this could be misused in the future as a weapon to criminalise groups of people that the government wishes, for reasons of political expediency, to scapegoat. I guess that would never happen in the UK, right?