Darcy you used the term “right wing nutjobs” which does not offend me, but you or someone chose to remove it.
If you say otherwise, I know you are a liar.

Darcy removed his nutjob comment. 😀

Don’t worry Darcy I would not accuse you of possibly calling me a Mong based on that.

If you had read my post that was pulled you would have read my explanation for calling you special.

PS it was very charming insult you used that gave another lovely insight into the kind of person you are.
Will you call me a mong for this reply

Why was my response to junkyards insulting post pulled.
When Yunki told someone to get into the sea and called them a turd or insulted my long suffering mum that never got pulled

I would not call you a Mong no.
I explained my self once only to have it pulled so it would be pointless do it again.

You mean I’m not a bit special after all ?

Sorry to break it to like this, but I think it’s better you know.

chip – Member
you really are a bit special.:D

I was referring to junkyard rudeness and way he talks to people who do not share his opinion.

according to the French they are sharing intelligence and targets with the Russians.

It does not say that, it says they have had a conversation agreeing to a joint military operation with France, Which would make sense to share Intel, does not mean the french will start bombing on assads say so or the Russians will stop.

you really are a bit special.:D

and they are infallible dont forget that bit

No they are not, but they are not going in gung Ho randomly dropping as many bombs as possible for the sake of dropping bombs.

In Iraq it is not uncommon for our bombers to come back complete with all there bombs due to no legitimate targets.
Were determined.

The Russians are targeting good people???!!!
Bastards.

No, the Russians are bombing targets requested by assads forces who we know not causing collateral damage to and killing the civilian population is high on their priority list, not.

Where as the French are using there own intelligence and do care about accidentally or other wise targeting civilians.

Yes of course, their bombs only kill bad people.

No you only target the bad people.

I heard on the radio yesterday that the French are launching 7 sorties a day in syria To the Russians 160+ sorties a day.
The reason being the French have no one on the ground calling in the strikes, where as the Russians are working in conjunction with assads forces on the ground who are requesting 600-800 air strikes a day.

Also the French have been clinical with there choice of targets and bombing with no civilian collateral damage where as the Russians are blowing up civilians a plenty.

Nose hair pulling here also, intense pain and pleasure at the same time.
When I was little pre duvet years I had blankets with a satiny finish at the top, used to run this between my fingers.
Dogs ears too.

Only if it ever carried a nuclear weapon, which was one missile, not bombs, unless it carried conventional HE dumb iron bombs, like for the Falklands operation.
The nuclear weapon was the Blue Steel ‘stand-off bomb’, basically a guided air-launched cruise missile weighing 17,000lb, travelling at Mach 3.
I doubt very much indeed whether a Vulcan ever carried a live nuclear weapon. Unlike the Americans, and quite likely the Russians.

So you did not watch it then.

A bomber laden with nuclear warheads less deadly than a corsa. 😀

Someone had to.

I find it a little strange that there is so much love for a bomber somewhere there is no appetite for bombing.

Same when there is any aircraft thread, it is mainly filled with military aircraft, they the very tools of war which most here are quick to damn.

Butcher it roadside with my trusty Swiss Army knife, chops are much easier to carry plus a nice seat cover from the hide.

But is an all out war with Isis not inevitable sooner or later.
And the later will be harder fought.

No, I want to know if someone had a better idea on what to do not just what not to do.

Doesn’t the other thread already contain a few options?

Not many no.

The overriding consensus is no we should not bomb but not many alternatives were given.

Schoolboy error, how did I post this in the wrong forum, people might think I actually ride my bike.

Mods Please move this to the chat forum.

So what do you suggest is to be done about IS.

My mum is far from silly. She’s a mean, mean old lady. But she’s my mum what can I do?

I’d blow both him and his victim up with a drone. That’ll sort it out.

That’s just silly!

We are never going to agree, I believe is are pure evil and they need to be destroyed, wether it can be done or not you can’t just leave them to it.
And I don’t believe some thing should be done about them but we should leave it to someone else to do it.

All those who believe we should not bomb Isis. Is it because you believe it will encourage them to attack Britain.
Is it because you think it’s not our problem as it is not here the are murdering and raping there way across the country.
Or do you think it would be better for the people of the “hot” countries to be left in the grip of is.

I believe they are here already.
I believe it is our problem and once they had taken Iraq and Syria they would not stop And then it would be our problem in a big way.
And I don’t think the people of the hot countries are best left at the mercy of is.

Seriously google image is to get a brief glimpse of life under is.

We should never have left Iraq and instead have stayed until it had begun to prosper.
We should never had encouraged the civil war in Syria .
We should have squashed Isis the moment they reared their ugly head.

Anyone who thinks leaving Isis to their own devices is the way to go and it will sort its self out are deluded.

I have been saying bomb them for over a year because what they were doing in hot countries. And over a year ago I said they would commit exactly the atrocities that they have gone on to do in France. And I was told I was being stupid it would never happen.

If no one had been bombing Isis they probably would have taken Iraq by now.

ISIS can’t achieve much beyond terrorist outrages.

Here maybe, for now.

Isis are the biggest threat to world peace since ww2, I like world peace, so think the world should unite and smack the shit out of the vicious ****.

The worst thing that could happen is to leave them unchecked to grow further into an actual state. Oil rich, cash rich and then go on to develop WMDs with their MO.

They are a threat, but unchecked they just will become an ever bigger threat.

If a crazy person in the street asked you for a fight would you say yes? Of course not, you walk away because they are crazy.

But what if he was raping some one would you intervene .

I think every country who has bombs should pitch up and drop them on Isis, that’s what they are for, shame to waste them.

When I was twenty two my eighteen year old nephew told me he was going out with a beautiful blonde 17 year old who was going to be a page 3 girl.
He said she was from up north I think but was being put up in a house or flat by the daily star who was waiting for her to to eighteen to then put her on page three. My first name is kelley, so my nephew then went on to say this blonde girl shared her flat/ house with another seventeen year waiting for her page 3 debut who had the same name as me and I should go on a double date with her, her friend and him that weekend.

I said no, as her being seventeen was too young for me. Any way apparently she went on to do well for herself and to date Jason statham and billy Zane.

I

Did you have pudding?

Did you demonstrate how to change an inner tube and then throw the old one up in the air until it got hung up on the office lighting Before leaving in a wake of empty energy bar wrappers.