Wobblyscott, thanks for this
So explain how, despite continual growth, we’re reducing our CO2 emissions then. Growth makes us richer, means we can afford to introduce new and cleaner technologies. Take away peoples ability to get wealthier then any reductions in CO2 emissions will halt and reverse. take away growth and you eliminate investment overnight therefore eliminate any incentive for anyone to do anything different, develop new technologies, develop new products and supply chains that improve our environmental situation etc. Making people poorer is never a solution to any problem.
You make some very good and positive points there about environmental investment and I can take that on board. But from my perspective, when I see that global population has trebled in my 64 years of life and CO2 emissions per capita have not significantly reduced, the numbers speak for themselves. Most £s invested are purely to make more £s not to benefit society or the planet. The exponential progress in technology, fueled by market forces more often than not results in built in obsolescence and incredible waste of resources rather than durability and sustainability. We in our part of the world were the root cause of this and I don’t blame the peoples and governments of developing countries for wanting their slice of the consumer cake, they have had the rough end of the deal all along.