Forum Replies Created

Viewing 40 posts - 1,121 through 1,160 (of 2,829 total)
  • Do I Need Bike Insurance? Your Bicycle Insurance Questions Answered
  • bwaarp
    Free Member

    http://www.pinkbike.com/news/Syntace-W35-MX-Wheels-Tested.html

    WANT. Badly. In fact I want the 40mm wide ones for a laugh seeing as they only weigh 1800 grams, I just don’t know what they’d do to 2.35 Maxxis Minions/High Rollers

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    Syntace MX35’s for the lighter and wider than flows and strong option. Not cheap though.

    The Chinese carbon rims are meant to be very good (what’s the companies name? light bikes or something?)

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    It could be Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo… it less likely to be due to blood pressure if it’s just raising your head whilst sitting down or standing up that is triggering it. Does it happen when you go from sitting to standing?

    Did your doctor test your blood pressure sitting down and standing up – if he did the tests would give a good indication of whether you have orthostatic hypotension which is where your body doesn’t adjust it’s blood pressure quickly enough when you go from sitting to standing.

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    Yeah thats why 30,000 people have signed

    30,000 people are uninformed idiots.

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    It was dealt with diplomatically, they gave him the lowest sentence they legally could and let him stay in the forces. He won’t end up doing the full 18 months, he’ll effectively be having a gap year in a prison thinking about what an idiot he’s been. As opposed to spending 5-10 years in the slammer with a discharge.

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    Nahh, I’m inclined to agree with MSP. Letting him off the hook would encourage any pongo lacking a few brain cells to bring home firearms.

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    Everyone keeps saying that about the Barons, I may have to give em a go Northwind….but I do like the weight of my single ply High Rollers for my AM bike….those Barons are quite heavy for non ust tyres arn’t they?

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    In the words of a friend of mine….if he wasn’t 22 but say REME… he would have been thrown out for leaving that kind of shit lying round his house….

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    The gun was in his wardrobe, in it’s case and he had;

    122 x 9mm live rounds of ammunition
    40 x 7.62mm live rounds of ammunition
    50 x 9mm frangible rounds of ammunition
    50 x 338 armour piercing live rounds of ammunition
    2 x .308 live rounds of ammunition
    74 x 5.56mm live rounds of ammunition

    under his bed. Not exactly put in his house.

    LMAO apparently he’s read to much Chris Ryan and decided because he’s special forces having a personal armoury in your house is perfectly legal and also a good idea! Jeeze

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    Here’s a post from Arrse that is more or less what I thought.

    +1 to the post above as well. Pleaded guilty because he knew his defence was unsound.

    Edited to add: Let’s no be confused by the evidence of his memory; this was all after the fact of importing and storing the weapon. In other words he appeared to be of sound mind when he allowed the weapon to be imported to the UK (not that he was charged with that) and then stored it. Unless he was completely bonkers from the moment he was allegedly handed the weapon by Iraqi LN, there is, it appears, no defence. Furthermore, no alternative explanation of how he came to be in possession of the weapon (not that this would be a credible defence under this law).

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    What if someone put one in your house?
    That’s pretty much what happened here.

    This more or less sums it up. He pleaded guilty as the consequences of fighting it and losing were quite dire.

    It’s not illegal to be sent dodgey stuff because you’re not responsible for your post. It’s not illegal not to open your post, so if you had an unopened item of post that contained something illegal, there would presumably be an argument in law to say that you were not responsible for that item.

    But the prosecution’s argument would have been that he was ‘being sent his stuff’ and knew that his stuff contained a pistol.

    The counter argument would have been that he didn’t remember having a pistol.

    And they decided not to gamble. I think they were sensible.

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    It’s not a miscarriage of justice as there are no real mitigating factors that would let you off the hook for having a section 5 firearm lying around the house – bar if you’ve just bought a house and you find one under the floorboards etc. The offence is the possession of the firearm not the circumstances surrounding it.

    What it seems to come down to, is…
    He didn’t intend for the gun to come back to the UK- it was packed up with other stuff and sent back by other people.
    He hadn’t opened the container it was in- so did he know what was in it?

    He had wanted to bring it back to the UK as a gift to the regiment. So I should imagine his mates packed it with that in mind.

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    From what I’d read he was intending to take it back anyway and that it would have been okay had it been kept at work and handed to the regiment for deactivation. It’s when it was taken outside of work that it became an issue.

    There was a case of a squaddy killing his ex with a war trophy kalashnikov and quite a few cases of squaddies brining illegal weapons into the uk, they’re trying to clamp down on it and this will probably serve as a warning.

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    I think the general consensus over at ARRSE was that you shouldn’t be bringing firearms back home as war trophies and that the judge gave him the lowest possible sentence he could as incarceration for the possession of an illegal firearm is mandatory.

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    Freudian slip?

    I have no idea what you’re on about sir.

    :mrgreen:

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    I had a few issues going from high rollers to hans Dampfs. With hrs you just slap the bike over into flat corners stand on the outside pedal and it grips. Hans threw me on the floor a few times until I realised what was going on. Different tyres handle different.

    I like to chuck the bike around and throw it over aggressively into a corner – some people like to ride smoothly – so these tyre’s are probably not great for me then? I was so leant over the other day mid corner I was reminded of superbike lean angles and I had the front and rear drifting – and still managed to pick the bike up without dabbing! I truly have no idea why people don’t like High Rollers. I’ll stay away from Hans Dampfs then, I was about to try some as well!

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    Hundreds of downhillers disagree with this thread. Nothing comes close to the good old High Roller.

    Besides in the winter you should be running a Minion on the front if you arn’t running a mud specific tyre anyway – as mud tyres are shit in anything but mud.

    The OP probably has the CHEAPO HARD COMPOUND OEM tyres as they came with the bike!

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    2.35 High Rollers….if you can be bothered humping them around….they are massively better than the Mk2 Mountain King 2.2 black chillis that I had on my Mega when it comes to rooty terrain….

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    Big drop? 👿 Nice vid though and some good riding…..now go and do a bigger drop…once you’ve got to that height they are all the same! 🙂

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    I beat a load of cyclocrossers up a large fireroad climb at CyB once, with my seatpost slammed on a 32lb Nukeproof Mega using a Supertacky high roller on the front and flat pedals.

    That was a good day. Their faces were hilarious when I gave them a big smile and said “Alright lads”, I was wearing baggies as well and they were out in club kit. Good times.

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    Whenever I see walkers coming up singletrack that they shouldn’t be on (eg CyB) I just shout “Get the **** off”, go death grips and hope for the best.

    They tend to get out the way.

    If you hit 1 you get 1 brownie point. 2 for red socked ramblers. 3 for a chav and 4 for Audi drivers. You get an extra point for serious injuries that land them in A&E. Two pedestrians is a double-kill and worth an extra 2 points etc.

    Also I paint kill marks on the side of my bike whenever I hit one, like WW2 fighter pilots did.

    Also, I’m joking, before someone sues me.

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    Big **** off Maglites are great for staying in brothies….

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    Agreed, battlefield 3 is also very good but I found it much harder to get into than COD and it only works if you have a squad to play with regularly.

    That depends on the map, on Metro, Seine or any of the new Close quaters maps then you don’t need a squad. Tbh I don’t need a regular squad to play with on anything but the very large Armoured Kill maps. Even on the huge Armoured Kill maps, there’s nothing like going lone wolf with a sniper rifle and getting a kill at 700 meters plus.

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    Meh…. sod all old people have mortgages. They paid them off years ago before house prices rocketed. The people that are getting kicked out of their homes are young families.

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    surely that is ok if only the very best, the creme of the crop, get to go to uni. if each student was now given a grant it would bankrupt the system.

    i honestly don’t believe that we need to send more than 10-15% of school leavers to university in order to fill key jobs.

    Sorry we do, we need a high tech economy producing and designing the next big things. We don’t want an economy tailored to producing and exporting rubber dog shit.

    Have you seen how different and more complex a nurses job is now compared to 50, 30 hell 15 years ago? They need to know their shit. It doesn’t take a high IQ to do well and be competent in academic fields. Unlike your generation I think a lot of the new generation understand this, how else do you explain classes around the world in bog standard state schools producing highly driven motivated students that are achieving in computer sciences, engineering, health, economics, geology etc? My current girlfriend went to a state school in the Philippines where practically everyone in her year ended up getting good degree’s at university because they work…really really **** hard. That year would have followed the normal distribution curve for intelligence!

    What you’re doing is discouraging our current crop of students from competing with them, you want to dumb our economy down. Unless you want to be a factory line worker, a bricky, a chef, a squaddy or policeman you now NEED a degree – because most jobs now need people that can think critically and/or need training and academic competencies that meet certain standards that are best taught in a university setting (eg it’s much easier to train nurses centrally at universities and get standards the same throughout the board than it is to do ‘on the job training’).

    Furthermore, education produces a more intelligent population. Get this, the brain is plastic. Yep that’s right, your capacity to learn and think is not set in stone by your genetics….it is in fact highly influenced by environmental factors. So, whilst the rest of the world gets more intelligent….would you rather that the UK’s average IQ/academic ability started to fall behind?

    The problem with certain older generations is that they’re living in the **** stone age…..welcome to the brave new world! You want the best? Pay for it….spend it on the young as they’re your damn future….. and quit spending it on classic boomer love affairs like keeping codgers alive till they’re 106…. or shiny new submarines for the red faced Argentine hating tory supporters who still think we should be a world power.

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    Battlefield 3 = waiii better than Black Ops II

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    Yeah we had some installed on our street recently, they’re bright white and akin to footy stadium spotlights! They go right through my blackout blinds as well!

    Total darkness is good, if not essential for healthy human sleep! Complain!

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=GtB65IADRjIC&pg=PA624&lpg=PA624&dq=police+trawling+psychology&source=bl&ots=82e7JZHbCJ&sig=je5ga6mum4xG4eKuNLiJKlEvL4g&hl=en&sa=X&ei=hXGlUOm8PM6S0QWFs4GACA&ved=0CDkQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=trawling&f=false

    This is and interesting subject, bugger I want to study Psychology now as well as Biology and Statistics. To many interesting subjects, to little time! I wonder if this same argument about police trawling and false confessions can also be made with false accusations, I must read more!

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    Nice article here on Spiked

    http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/reviewofbooks_article/6161

    Is this current saga just a rerun of the conspiracy theories that were running around back then?

    This triggered the largest child abuse investigation in Britain, which used a novel method of police investigation: trawling former residents of care homes for retrospective allegations. This method means that, instead of acting upon allegations of abuse made spontaneously by individuals, the police contacted those who were resident at the care home at the time of the alleged abuse.

    The trawling method resulted in allegations from 650 witnesses, who accused 365 people of abusing them at homes throughout North Wales. When only six prosecutions followed, with only two new convictions for sexual abuse, the police and the authorities were accused of mounting a cover-up, with police officers said to belong to the very paedophile ring they were supposed to be investigating.

    The story became a national scandal. A senior police officer, publicly accused of raping adolescent boys at Bryn Estyn, sued two national newspapers, a magazine and a television company for libel and won. However, rumours of a cover-up persisted; and in 1996 the then Tory government set up the largest Tribunal of Inquiry in British history, under Sir Ronald Waterhouse. In February 2000, the Tribunal made damning findings of extensive abuse in North Wales – although it did not find evidence of a police cover-up. By then, the police trawling operation which had begun there had spread to the whole of Britain. Police forces collected allegations against 5,000 former care workers and teachers, and hundreds were arrested.

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    It seems to be a lot of unsubstantiated rumours to me – especially on that blog, in fact there seems to be a rather interesting take on this affair relating to Welsh care homes by a prominent historian – “The Secret of Bryn Estyn: The Making of a Modern Witch Hunt”

    Nominated for an Orwell prize and I’ve never heard of it! Here’s a review on Amazon

    The Secret of Bryn Estyn, first published in 2005, is an indictment of the British press, judiciary, police and the chattering classes. The story represented the projection of the mythical into the public arena in the form of a moral panic. The story became a national scandal, paraded through the press whose peddling of pap was in itself a scandal of horrendous proportions. Fired by “superstitious secularism” – devised and subsequently discredited in North America – it found apologists such as the Marxist journalist Bea Campbell who proclaimed the existence of Satanic cults infiltrating whole communities. The damage done to the victims of such “crusading” journalism (snatched from loving homes by intellectually limited and professionally myopic social workers) was incalculable.

    According to first reports Bryn Estyn was a network of evil – a paedophile ring whose members included a senior North Wales police officer and other public figures. Over a period of ten years thousands were accused and hundreds arrested using the now discredited system of police trawling which reversed the age old principle of innocent until proved guilty. As Webster made clear some allegations were made almost by police invitation. In many cases the motivation for the allegations was to make money. The alleged paedophile ring never existed. Just two men were convicted.

    In 1999 the BBC broadcast a programme entitled A Place of Safety in which several former residents of Bryn Estyn made allegations against staff members. Yet all the accusers had left the institution before the accused staff members had joined and had never met them. At least five of the seven complainants had previously made allegations which had been proved to be manifestly false, yet their new allegations were uncritically accepted at face value.

    Webster’s complaint was that journalists, who should have pursued the truth, simply regurgitated falsehoods by neglecting their primary investigative duty. Facts were no longer sacred, opinion became “truth” and the journalists and false accusers received public awards which some, to their shame, have never acknowledged were bought at the expense of public trust and personal integrity. The recent case of alleged child abuse on Jersey shows the lesson has still not been learned and, meanwhile, the innocent remain in jail.

    Webster never denied that some abuse took place. Indeed, he was relentless in his pursuit of the truth, identifying flaws in the police and public case against care workers, which transformed many baseless accusations into prosecutions by means of tactics worthy of a police state, in which the rules of normal justice were abandoned in order to “get a result”. False allegations were effectively encouraged and believed by those who had the intelligence to know better but lacked the capacity to use it. The real result was systematic injustice. It was a modern day witch hunt which the subsequent Waterhouse Enquiry, which Webster regards as a “judicial disaster”, failed to recognise, still less discover the truth which Webster so painstakingly uncovered.

    I disagree with Webster’s correlation of moral panic with the “continuing reverence for the idea of evil” which he considers is “not only unreal” but “part of a fantasy of righteousness which has been encouraged by the Judaeo-Christian tradition over a period of centuries.” Using this analysis he suggests that “we disown and deny our own sexual and satanic impulses and attribute them to others” then licence ourselves to indulge such fantasies with ferocious condemnation of the supposed evil conspiracy.

    In the case of Bryn Estyn was not the idea of evil which created the moral panic but the inability of human beings (individually and collectively) to identify or recognise objective reality. This failure was not motivated by the concept of evil but by personal pride, jealousy, untruths, lack of professional detatchment, vanity and willful myopia. The capacity of human beings to place themselves at the centre of a mythical world of their own creation is not necessarily tied up with the concept of evil. Yet such disagreement pales into insignificance against the damage done to society during this irrational affair.

    We should never forget that facts remain sacred, opinion comes at a cost. In a free society people need to use their intellect to distinguish between one and the other. The real Secret of Bryn Estyn (ruthlessly exposed by Webster’s brilliant and enduring work) was that on this occasion they did not. Everyone should read this book to make sure it never happens again. Unquestionably five stars for this investigative classic. Buy it, read it. Your trust of those in authority will never be the same again

    Gonna have to buy this one just to see a different take on the matter.

    Make of it what you will but this whole saga smacks of mob justice. I tell you what, accidently getting caught up in an affair like this has put me right off ever doing a public service type job eg teaching.

    Lots of accusations, very little hard evidence in court so far – I will make up my mind about people once they have gone to court and had a fair trial, not before then.

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    Or become a middle class Traveller and get a narrow boat.

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    was out on my bike last week on a country road and then next minute I hear snarling, feel the back of my bike get clattered and something scampering close to my wheel. Can only assume it was either a Grizzly bear or a Badger. Given it was pitch black and my light was only illuminating in front and turning around just revealed a dark void I sprinted up the unlight country road as fast as my little legs could carry me. After about a mile I kept thinking to myself that I must have out run it!

    Interested to hear any other tails as I am about to go out again, but think I will do a different route tonight. Bigs girls blouse I hear you say, you will encounter bigger furry creatures on the Tour Divide:-O

    The Rutland Panther?

    Seriously, I’ve seen it and I wasn’t on drugs. :mrgreen:

    I’m not doing night rides at Wakerly any more lol! :mrgreen:

    http://www.thisisleicestershire.co.uk/Big-cat-sighting-Oakham-couple-spot-panther-like/story-16820665-detail/story.html

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    “Final on McAlpine: am VERY sorry for inadvertently fanning flames. But I tweet as me, forgetting that to some of u I am Mrs bloody Speaker”.

    She sounds a lot like Andrew Mitchell, above the law and all that.

    Buh Bye Sally Bercow

    Ahhh the irony of public witch hunts…

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    It’s just not a very exposed area though is it? I’d have thought you’d have to be bloody unlucky to suffer impact damage there!

    You possibly don’t ride hard enough or rocky enough terrain. That or you’re the definition of a smooth rider. What size rotors do you run?

    On rocky loose trails you will ding your rotors.

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    The thing is, I think borderline libellous claims and organized coercion are how many people from any pressure group operate, I think that this way of thinking has got the better of him. I’ve always thought those involved in groups such as the anti-abortion movement, green or animal rights movements, or the EDL etc have a rather childish way of thinking. But hey, those are just my slightly random thoughts out loud…

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    Ctrl-F search “innuendo”

    http://www.yourrights.org.uk/yourrights/right-of-free-expression/defamation/defamation-elements-of-a-claim.html

    It seem’s it’s still POTENTIALLY libel (before Monbiot sues me :mrgreen: )…..

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    In your glee to rubbish a journalist, spare a thought for the truth yet again being buried.

    What truth?

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    Divorce your missus and join the Foreign Legion.

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    I suspect Tesco will be the real winners here, to see the biggest thorn in their side hoisted by his own petard!

    His personality that leant itself to picking fights and sticking it “to da man” got the better of him. He couldn’t resist mouthing off about the Tory establishment in this case and it turned round and buggered him in the arse…metaphorically speaking before anyone sues me :mrgreen:

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    FWIW stopping eating meat is the easiest thing to do to reduce your personal carbon footprint with it being split in thirds between food, transport and housing[energy usage] – you mention only one of these

    Who’s that addressed to.

    Any actually…the GREENEST diet….is the one that can be produced most locally….for example….a lot of North Wales land is not suitable for arable farming…it’s greener for those locals to eat some meat than it is to import more fruit, veg and wheat.

    I think Stanford did a large study that showed a small portion of meat during the week is the greenest diet. I like to point this out to green vegan hippies that I meet when riding in North Wales.

Viewing 40 posts - 1,121 through 1,160 (of 2,829 total)