It seems that 650b is an “answer” to an economic rather than a biking issue.
There’s a recession. People are cutting back and where they can, are buying good quality second hand stuff. So, how do the bike industry respond and make people buy new things?
Simple, a new “standard”. If most new bikes are the new standard, there’s no (or at best, a sorely restricted) second hand parts market. And the losers with a now “defunct” standard? Tough. All your cash are belong to Trek or Giant or one of the other behemoths with a buy in to delivering ever greater shareholder value. It’s all BS.
We’ve seen the same thing happen with smaller components over a while. BB’s and cranks. 4/5 arm cranks, o/s handlebars. And then the push to taper steerers etc etc. The issue is that the big boys have got greedy. New wheels, not enough, now frame not enough. Now they want the second hand market dead and you dumping 5k every other year on a new bike.
What they can’t see is that they’re killing MTBing. People are buying less. And “new” folk won’t bother because there’s too many variables and too much to understand. Want a racer? 1 size of wheels, all bikes look alike. Want an MTB? What are you doing with it? XC? 29er. DH? 26… or 650b. All round? Who knows? Sticker shock and buyer confusion. At the same time the “little guys” like Cotic suffer too, as they can’t carry all frame sizes and (understandably) don’t want to bet the farm on a new, possibly failing standard.
It’s like VHS/Beta, BluRay/HD DVD all over again – and on both these occasions, the ordinary Joe stopped buying till a standard was agreed on. Except in MTB, there’s *always* a new standard.
well said