In my day (I am 51) a lot of people went to work and studied by day release or similar to get qualifications – mine was in accountancy, no degree needed to get started. I started work at 17 and gained my qualifications some years later while earning money and paying into a pension etc.
I heard that university admissions has increased by 3 times in this time although TJ has suggested 10 times a couple of hours ago (5% to 50%). I do not know which is correct but a lot more young adults are now going into further education – is this really required? And someone has to pay for it hence the problem we now have.
Stuart Baggs did not go to Uni and he has done OK;-)
My cousin now lives in the USA and he is thinking of sending his 17 year old daughter to a UK university as it will be cheaper than than studying in the USA.
My daughter is 25 and it cost me £18k+ to put her through a 4 year law course, do not know how much her mother contributed. She still had a substantial debt at the end. (Never inquired as the level as she could ‘not afford to eat’ on the £35 a week I was giving her. Note I paid her rent, utilities, 2 x laptops etc so this was to feed herself)
Also agree with TJ regarding the difference over the years. My sister went to Bradford university in the late 1970’s and she lived a lot less well then my daughters generation – not sure if that was a good thing or not.
Future students will not pay until the end of there education rather than up-front which is helpful to people from poorer families. We do need to train future generations but paying for it, and the balance between student and state is a difficult one.